Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888458›Full record

SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021

Modelling the Anatomic Distribution of Neurologic Events in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review of MRI Findings.

N Parsons, A Outsikas, A Parish, R Clohesy, F D'Aprano, F Toomey, S Advani, G R Poudel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Emerging Knowledge of the Neurobiology of COVID-19.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

N ParsonsFrom the Cognitive Neuroscience Unit (N.P.).ORCID 0000-0002-1010-1871
A OutsikasSchool of Psychology (N.P., A.O., A.P., R.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-9128-3995
A ParishSchool of Psychology (N.P., A.O., A.P., R.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-6551-9765
R ClohesySchool of Psychology (N.P., A.O., A.P., R.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-3738-8446
F D'ApranoMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences (F.D.), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9657-2999
F ToomeySchool of Medicine (F.T.), Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5397-1327
S AdvaniSocial Behavioural Research Branch (S.A.), National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-1446-969X
G R PoudelDepartment of Health Sciences (G.R.P.), Mary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia. govinda.poudel@acu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0043-7531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurologic events have been reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, a model-based evaluation of the spatial distribution of these events is lacking. PURPOSE: Our aim was to quantitatively evaluate whether a network diffusion model can explain the spread of small neurologic events. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and LitCovid data bases were searched from January 1, 2020, to July 19, 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Thirty-five case series and case studies reported 317 small neurologic events in 123 unique patients with COVID-19. DATA ANALYSIS: Neurologic events were localized to gray or white matter regions of the Illinois Institute of Technology (gray-matter and white matter) Human Brain Atlas using radiologic images and descriptions. The total proportion of events was calculated for each region. A network diffusion model was implemented, and any brain regions showing a significant association ( DATA SYNTHESIS: Within gray matter, neurologic events were widely distributed, with the largest number of events (∼10%) observed in the bilateral superior temporal, precentral, and lateral occipital cortices, respectively. Network diffusion modeling showed a significant association between predicted and measured gray matter events when the spread of pathology was seeded from the bilateral cerebellum ( LIMITATIONS: The risk of bias was not considered because all studies were either case series or case studies.

conclusionsTransconnectome diffusion of pathology via the structural network of the brain may contribute to the spread of neurologic events in patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

BrainCerebral CortexCOVID-19Gray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingWhite Matter

Identifiers

PMID33888458
PMCPMC8324279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.