Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888316›Full record

ArticleSurgery2021

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in women aged 70 and older: An analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Chandler S Cortina, Carmen R Bergom, Julie Kijack, Abigail A Thorgerson, Chiang-Ching Spencer Huang, Amanda L Kong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Survivorship Issues in Older Adults with Breast Cancer.Current breast cancer reports · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. National Trends in "Going Flat" After Mastectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chandler S CortinaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI. Electronic address: ccortina@mcw.edu.
Carmen R BergomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Julie KijackDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Abigail A ThorgersonCenter for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Chiang-Ching Spencer HuangZilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.
Amanda L KongDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer incidence in women aged ≥70 years is steadily increasing, and many are choosing to undergo postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). We aimed to identify factors associated with PMBR, describe reconstruction types, and assess postoperative mortality and re-admission rates in women ≥70 years of age.

methodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was examined between 2004 and 2015 for women aged ≥70 years with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy. Statistical analysis was performed by χ

resultsA total 73,973 patients met inclusion criteria and 4,552 (6.1%) underwent PMBR, of which 25% had a CPM. 48% had implant reconstruction, 36.2% underwent autologous reconstruction, and 15.1% received combination reconstruction. PMBR was more likely to be performed in patients who were White, had fewer comorbidities, were treated in the Northeast metropolitan areas, and with lower tumor stage (P < .001). CPM was more likely to be performed in patients who were White and treated in community hospitals in rural areas in the South and West. (P < .05). Although 30-day readmission rates were higher in PMBR patients (3.5% vs 2.8%, P < .001), 30 and 90-day mortality rates were lower: 0.03 and 0.2% vs 0.3 and 0.9% (P < .001).

conclusionAlthough it is understandable that intrinsic tumor characteristics influence the role of PMBR, further research and interventions should be aimed to eliminate the differences that are seen in patient race and geographic location. Readmission and postop mortality rates are overall low and comparable to that of younger patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMammaplastyMastectomyProphylactic MastectomyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33888316
PMCPMC8217182
OpenAlexW3152654793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.