Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888165›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2021

Behavioural intention of receiving COVID-19 vaccination, social media exposures and peer discussions in China.

Sitong Luo, Meiqi Xin, Suhua Wang, Junfeng Zhao, Guohua Zhang, Lijuan Li, Liping Li, Joseph Tak-Fai Lau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. COVID-19 Vaccination Strategy in China: A Case Study.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Understanding a national increase in COVID-19 vaccination intention, the Netherlands, November 2020-March 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sitong LuoCentre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territory, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Meiqi XinCentre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territory, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Suhua WangGraduate School of Baotou Medical College, Baotou Medical College, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China.
Junfeng ZhaoDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Guohua ZhangDepartment of Psychology, School of Psychiatry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Lijuan LiSchool of Public Health, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, China.
Liping LiShantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Joseph Tak-Fai LauCentre for Health Behaviours Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territory, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2344-7107

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate behavioural intentions to receive free and self-paid COVID-19 vaccinations (BICV-F and BICV-SP) among Chinese university students if the vaccine was 80% effective with rare mild side effects, to examine their associations with social media exposures and peer discussions regarding COVID-19 vaccination, and to explore the mediational role of perceived information sufficiency about COVID-19 vaccination. An online anonymous survey (N = 6922) was conducted in November 2020 in five Chinese provinces. Logistic regression and path analysis were adopted. The prevalence of BICV-F and BICV-SP were 78.1% and 57.7%. BICV-F was positively associated with the frequencies of passive social media exposure (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.32, P < 0.001), active social media interaction (AOR = 1.13, P < 0.001) and peer discussions (AOR = 1.17, P < 0.001). Indirect effects of the three factors on BICV-F via perceived information sufficiency were all significant (P < 0.001). The direct effect of active social media interaction on BICV-F was significantly negative (P < 0.001). Similar associations/mediations were observed for BICV-SP. The COVID-19 vaccination intention of Chinese university students needs improvement. Boosting social media exposures and peer discussions may raise students' perceived information sufficiency and subsequently increase their vaccination intention. Considering the potential negative effect of active social media interaction, caution is needed when using social media to promote COVID-19 vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesHealth BehaviorIntentionAdolescentAdultChinaCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Social MediaStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesBehavioural intentionCOVID-19 vaccinationdiscussioninformation sufficiencysocial media

Identifiers

PMID33888165
PMCPMC8267342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.