Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888132›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2021

Safety profile of enhanced thromboprophylaxis strategies for critically ill COVID-19 patients during the first wave of the pandemic: observational report from 28 European intensive care units.

Andrea Lavinio, Ari Ercole, Denise Battaglini, Sandra Magnoni, Rafael Badenes, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Raimund Helbok, William Thomas, Paolo Pelosi, Chiara Robba and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Kidney implications of SARS-CoV2 infection in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  14. Clinical challenges of SARS-CoV-2 variants (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 20 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrea LavinioNeurosciences and Trauma Critical Care Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ari Ercole *Neurosciences and Trauma Critical Care Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Denise Battaglini *San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy.
Sandra MagnoniAnestesia e Rianimazione Ospedale Santa Chiara, APSS, Trento, Italy.
Rafael BadenesDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital Clinic Universitari, University of Valencia, INCLIVA Research Health Institute, Valencia, Spain. rafaelbadenes@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7017-0150
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Raimund HelbokDepartment of Neurology, Neurocritical Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
William ThomasHematology Department, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Paolo PelosiSan Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy.
Chiara RobbaSan Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy. kiarobba@gmail.com.
collaborators
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITInnsbruck Medical University · ATAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITOspedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi · ITUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Pisa · ITAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBUniversitat de València · ESAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITIstituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Milan · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITUniversity Hospital Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCritical illness from SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) is associated with a high burden of pulmonary embolism (PE) and thromboembolic events despite standard thromboprophylaxis. Available guidance is discordant, ranging from standard care to the use of therapeutic anticoagulation for enhanced thromboprophylaxis (ET). Local ET protocols have been empirically determined and are generally intermediate between standard prophylaxis and full anticoagulation. Concerns have been raised in regard to the potential risk of haemorrhage associated with therapeutic anticoagulation. This report describes the prevalence and safety of ET strategies in European Intensive Care Unit (ICUs) and their association with outcomes during the first wave of the COVID pandemic, with particular focus on haemorrhagic complications and ICU mortality.

methodsRetrospective, observational, multi-centre study including adult critically ill COVID-19 patients. Anonymised data included demographics, clinical characteristics, thromboprophylaxis and/or anticoagulation treatment. Critical haemorrhage was defined as intracranial haemorrhage or bleeding requiring red blood cells transfusion. Survival was collected at ICU discharge. A multivariable mixed effects generalised linear model analysis matched for the propensity for receiving ET was constructed for both ICU mortality and critical haemorrhage.

resultsA total of 852 (79% male, age 66 [37-85] years) patients were included from 28 ICUs. Median body mass index and ICU length of stay were 27.7 (25.1-30.7) Kg/m

conclusionsIn a cohort of critically ill patients with a high prevalence of thromboembolic events, ET was associated with reduced ICU mortality without an increased burden of haemorrhagic complications. This study suggests ET strategies are safe and associated with favourable outcomes. Whilst full anticoagulation has been questioned for prophylaxis in these patients, our results suggest that there may nevertheless be a role for enhanced / intermediate levels of prophylaxis. Clinical trials investigating causal relationship between intermediate thromboprophylaxis and clinical outcomes are urgently needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentPandemicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsCOVID-19Critical CareCritical IllnessEuropeFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsAnticoagulationCOVID-19HeparinIntensive care medicineProphylaxisThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID33888132
PMCPMC8061459
OpenAlexW3152944454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.