Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888096›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

A qualitative study of physician perceptions and experiences of caring for critically ill patients in the context of resource strain during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Laryssa G Kemp, Chloe de Grood, Rebecca Brundin-Mather, Henry T Stelfox, Josh S Ng-Kamstra, Kirsten M Fiest

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Experiences of U.S. frontline physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on critical care healthcare professionals' work practices and wellbeing: A qualitative study.Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeanna Parsons LeighFaculty of Health, School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. J.ParsonsLeigh@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8408-674X
Laryssa G KempDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Chloe de GroodDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Rebecca Brundin-MatherDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Henry T StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Josh S Ng-KamstraDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kirsten M FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CADalhousie University · CA

Funding

CIHR RN420046-439965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to global shortages in the resources required to care for critically ill patients and to protect frontline healthcare providers. This study investigated physicians' perceptions and experiences of caring for critically ill patients in the context of actual or anticipated resource strain during the COVID-19 pandemic, and explored implications for the healthcare workforce and the delivery of patient care.

methodsWe recruited a diverse sample of critical care physicians from 13 Canadian Universities with adult critical care training programs. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews between March 25-June 25, 2020 and used qualitative thematic analysis to derive primary themes and subthemes.

resultsFifteen participants (eight female, seven male; median age = 40) from 14 different intensive care units described three overarching themes related to physicians' perceptions and experiences of caring for critically ill patients during the pandemic: 1) Conditions contributing to resource strain (e.g., continuously evolving pandemic conditions); 2) Implications of resource strain on critical care physicians personally (e.g., safety concerns) and professionally (e.g. practice change); and 3) Enablers of resource sufficiency (e.g., adequate human resources).

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has required health systems and healthcare providers to continuously adapt to rapidly evolving circumstances. Participants' uncertainty about whether their unit's planning and resources would be sufficient to ensure the delivery of high quality patient care throughout the pandemic, coupled with fear and anxiety over personal and familial transmission, indicate the need for a unified systemic pandemic response plan for future infectious disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansAdultCanadaCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPerceptionSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Critical care physiciansQualitative researchResource strain

Identifiers

PMID33888096
PMCPMC8061878
OpenAlexW3155381824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.