Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888066›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

Physiological and biochemical responses of soybean plants inoculated with Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium under drought stress.

Mohamed S Sheteiwy, Dina Fathi Ismail Ali, You-Cai Xiong, Marian Brestic, Milan Skalicky, Yousef Alhaj Hamoud, Zaid Ulhassan, Hiba Shaghaleh, Hamada AbdElgawad, Muhammad Farooq and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
41.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The functional roles of endophyticFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Ameliorative effects of endophytes on morphological, biochemical and molecular changes inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Comprehensive Analysis of the OASTL Gene Family in Potato (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohamed S SheteiwyDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. salahco_2010@mans.edu.eg.
Dina Fathi Ismail AliDepartment of Agricultural Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
You-Cai XiongState Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Institute of Arid Agroecology, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China. xiongyc@lzu.edu.cn.
Marian BresticDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500, Prague, Czech Republic.
Milan SkalickyDepartment of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 16500, Prague, Czech Republic.
Yousef Alhaj HamoudCollege of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.
Zaid UlhassanInstitute of Crop Science and Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Hiba ShaghalehCollege of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Hamada AbdElgawadDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Beni-Suef, Beni-Suef, 62511, Egypt.
Muhammad FarooqDepartment of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, 123, Al-Khoud, Oman.
Anket SharmaState Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Ahmed M El-SawahDepartment of Agricultural Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. ahmedelsawah89@mans.edu.eg.
Mansoura University · EGCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZBeni-Suef University · EGHohai University · CNLanzhou University · CNNanjing Forestry University · CNSultan Qaboos University · OMZhejiang A & F University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study aims to study the effects of biofertilizers potential of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Bradyrhizobium japonicum (B. japonicum) strains on yield and growth of drought stressed soybean (Giza 111) plants at early pod stage (50 days from sowing, R3) and seed development stage (90 days from sowing, R5).

resultsHighest plant biomass, leaf chlorophyll content, nodulation, and grain yield were observed in the unstressed plants as compared with water stressed-plants at R3 and R5 stages. At soil rhizosphere level, AMF and B. japonicum treatments improved bacterial counts and the activities of the enzymes (dehydrogenase and phosphatase) under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Irrespective of the drought effects, AMF and B. japonicum treatments improved the growth and yield of soybean under both drought (restrained irrigation) and adequately-watered conditions as compared with untreated plants. The current study revealed that AMF and B. japonicum improved catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) in the seeds, and a reverse trend was observed in case of malonaldehyde (MDA) and proline under drought stress. The relative expression of the CAT and POD genes was up-regulated by the application of biofertilizers treatments under drought stress condition. Interestingly a reverse trend was observed in the case of the relative expression of the genes involved in the proline metabolism such as P5CS, P5CR, PDH, and P5CDH under the same conditions. The present study suggests that biofertilizers diminished the inhibitory effect of drought stress on cell development and resulted in a shorter time for DNA accumulation and the cycle of cell division. There were notable changes in the activities of enzymes involved in the secondary metabolism and expression levels of GmSPS1, GmSuSy, and GmC-INV in the plants treated with biofertilizers and exposed to the drought stress at both R3 and R5 stages. These changes in the activities of secondary metabolism and their transcriptional levels caused by biofertilizers may contribute to increasing soybean tolerance to drought stress.

conclusionsThe results of this study suggest that application of biofertilizers to soybean plants is a promising approach to alleviate drought stress effects on growth performance of soybean plants. The integrated application of biofertilizers may help to obtain improved resilience of the agro ecosystems to adverse impacts of climate change and help to improve soil fertility and plant growth under drought stress.

Indexed as

DroughtsBradyrhizobiumFertilizersGlycine maxMycorrhizaeStress, PhysiologicalFertilizersAMFFlow cytometryProline metabolismSecondary metabolismSoil enzymesSoybean yield

Identifiers

PMID33888066
PMCPMC8061216
OpenAlexW3156342680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.