Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888025›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2022

Can pragmatic research, real-world data and digital technologies aid the development of psychedelic medicine?

Robin L Carhart-Harris, Anne C Wagner, Manish Agrawal, Hannes Kettner, Jerold F Rosenbaum, Adam Gazzaley, David J Nutt, David Erritzoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Psychiatric risks for worsened mental health after psychedelic use.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robin L Carhart-HarrisCentre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6062-7150
Anne C WagnerRemedy, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-0133
Manish AgrawalMaryland Oncology and Hematology, Rockville, USA.
Hannes KettnerCentre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9482-0998
Jerold F RosenbaumMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Adam GazzaleyNeuroscape, Department of Neurology, Physiology and Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
David J NuttCentre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David ErritzoeCentre for Psychedelic Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7022-6211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Favourable regulatory assessments, liberal policy changes, new research centres and substantial commercial investment signal that psychedelic therapy is making a major comeback. Positive findings from modern trials are catalysing developments, but it is questionable whether current confirmatory trials are sufficient for advancing our understanding of safety and best practice. Here we suggest supplementing traditional confirmatory trials with pragmatic trials, real-world data initiatives and digital health solutions to better support the discovery of optimal and personalised treatment protocols and parameters. These recommendations are intended to help support the development of safe, effective and cost-efficient psychedelic therapy, which, given its history, is vulnerable to excesses of hype and regulation.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDigital TechnologyDrug DevelopmentHallucinogensHumansHallucinogenspragmatic trialspsychedelicsReal-world dataserotonin

Identifiers

PMID33888025
PMCPMC8801625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.