Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33887223›Full record

ArticleChemico-biological interactions2021

Potent toxic effects of Taroxaz-104 on the replication of SARS-CoV-2 particles.

Amgad M Rabie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemico-biological interactions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation of a series of nucleoside analogs as effective anticoronaviral-2 drugs against the Omicron-B.1.1.529/BA.2 subvariant: A repurposing research study.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. In Silico Models for Anti-COVID-19 Drug Discovery: A Systematic Review.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of inflammation research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amgad M RabieDr. Amgad Rabie's Research Lab. for Drug Discovery (DARLD), Mansoura, Egypt; Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt. Electronic address: amgadpharmacist1@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyphenolics and 1,3,4-oxadiazoles are two of the most potent bioactive classes of compounds in medicinal chemistry, since both are known for their diverse pharmacological activities in humans. One of their prominent activities is the antimicrobial/antiviral activities, which are much apparent when the key functional structural moieties of both of them meet into the same compounds. The current COVID-19 pandemic motivated us to computationally screen and evaluate our library of previously-synthesized 2-(3,4,5-trihydroxyphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazoles against the major SARS-CoV-2 protein targets. Interestingly, few ligands showed promising low binding free energies (potent inhibitory interactions/affinities) with the active sites of some coronaviral-2 enzymes, specially the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (nCoV-RdRp). One of them was 5,5'-{5,5'-[(1R,2R)-1,2-dihydroxyethane-1,2-diyl]bis(1,3,4-oxadiazole-5,2-diyl)}dibenzene-1,2,3-triol (Taroxaz-104), which showed significantly low binding energies (-10.60 and -9.10 kcal/mol) with nCoV-RdRp-RNA and nCoV-RdRp alone, respectively. These binding energies are even considerably lower than those of remdesivir potent active metabolite GS-443902 (which showed -9.20 and -7.90 kcal/mol with the same targets, respectively). Further computational molecular investigation revealed that Taroxaz-104 molecule strongly inhibits one of the potential active sites of nCoV-RdRp (the one with which GS-443902 molecule mainly interacts), since it interacts with at least seven major active amino acid residues of its predicted pocket. The successful repurposing of Taroxaz-104 has been achieved after the promising results of the anti-COVID-19 biological assay were obtained, as the data showed that Taroxaz-104 exhibited very significant anti-COVID-19 activities (anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCatalytic DomainChlorocebus aethiopsCoronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseDrug RepositioningEnzyme InhibitorsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Docking SimulationOxadiazolesProtein BindingSARS-CoV-2Vero CellsVirus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsCoronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseEnzyme InhibitorsNSP12 protein, SARS-CoV-2OxadiazolesAnti-COVID-19 drugAnti-VOC-202012/01 agentCoronavirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)Polyphenolic 2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-oxadiazole compoundSARS-CoV-2 strain/variant/lineage/mutantTaroxaz-104 molecule

Identifiers

PMID33887223
PMCPMC8055500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.