Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33887208›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted spike glycoprotein-clamp vaccine for SARS-CoV-2: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.

Keith J Chappell, Francesca L Mordant, Zheyi Li, Danushka K Wijesundara, Paula Ellenberg, Julia A Lackenby, Stacey T M Cheung, Naphak Modhiran, Michael S Avumegah, Christina L Henderson and 25 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04495933 (A Phase 1, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dosage-Escalation, Single Centre Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp Protein Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Adults Aged 18 to 55 Years Old and Healthy Older Adults, Aged 56 Years and Over), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04495933 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dosage-Escalation, Single Centre Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp Protein Subunit Vaccine in Healthy Adults Aged 18 to 55 Years Old and Healthy Older Adults, Aged 56 Years and Over

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of QueenslandRan2020 to 2024Enrolled216ConditionsSARS-CoV2, Covid19ArmsMF59 adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp vaccine 5mcg, MF59 adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp vaccine 15mcg, MF59 adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 Sclamp vaccine 45mcg, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The recent advances in vaccine adjuvants.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Keith J ChappellSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. Electronic address: k.chappell@uq.edu.au.
Francesca L MordantDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Zheyi LiDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Disease, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Danushka K WijesundaraSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Paula EllenbergDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Julia A LackenbySchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Stacey T M CheungSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Naphak ModhiranSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Michael S AvumegahSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Christina L HendersonSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Kym HogerThe Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Paul GriffinSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Nucleus Network Brisbane Clinic, Herston, QLD, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Mater Health, QLD, Australia.
Jillian BennetTanawell Nominees, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Luca HensenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Wuji ZhangDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Thi H O NguyenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sara Marrero-HernandezDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kevin J SelvaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Amy W ChungDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mai H TranTetraQ, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Peter TapleyTetraQ, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
James BarnesWHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Patrick C ReadingDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Suellen NicholsonVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stavroula CorbyVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Thomas HolgateVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Bruce D WinesImmune Therapies Group, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
P Mark HogarthImmune Therapies Group, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Katherine KedzierskaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Damian F J PurcellDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Charani RanasingheDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Disease, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Kanta SubbaraoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Daniel WattersonSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Paul R YoungSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Trent P MunroSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia; The Australian Institute for Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUPeter Doherty Institute · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUAustralian National University · AUBurnet Institute · AUVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory · AU

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the scale of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the development of vaccines based on different platforms is essential, particularly in light of emerging viral variants, the absence of information on vaccine-induced immune durability, and potential paediatric use. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted subunit vaccine for COVID-19 based on recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein stabilised in a pre-fusion conformation by a novel molecular clamp (spike glycoprotein-clamp [sclamp]).

methodsWe did a phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, block-randomised trial of the sclamp subunit vaccine in a single clinical trial site in Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Healthy adults (aged ≥18 to ≤55 years) who had tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, reported no close contact with anyone with active or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and tested negative for pre-existing SARS-CoV-2 immunity were included. Participants were randomly assigned to one of five treatment groups and received two doses via intramuscular injection 28 days apart of either placebo, sclamp vaccine at 5 μg, 15 μg, or 45 μg, or one dose of sclamp vaccine at 45 μg followed by placebo. Participants and study personnel, except the dose administration personnel, were masked to treatment. The primary safety endpoints included solicited local and systemic adverse events in the 7 days after each dose and unsolicited adverse events up to 12 months after dosing. Here, data are reported up until day 57. Primary immunogenicity endpoints were antigen-specific IgG ELISA and SARS-CoV-2 microneutralisation assays assessed at 28 days after each dose. The study is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04495933.

findingsBetween June 23, 2020, and Aug 17, 2020, of 314 healthy volunteers screened, 120 were randomly assigned (n=24 per group), and 114 (95%) completed the study up to day 57 (mean age 32·5 years [SD 10·4], 65 [54%] male, 55 [46%] female). Severe solicited reactions were infrequent and occurred at similar rates in participants receiving placebo (two [8%] of 24) and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose (three [3%] of 96). Both solicited reactions and unsolicited adverse events occurred at a similar frequency in participants receiving placebo and the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine. Solicited reactions occurred in 19 (79%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 86 (90%) of 96 receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Unsolicited adverse events occurred in seven (29%) of 24 participants receiving placebo and 35 (36%) of 96 participants receiving the SARS-CoV-2 sclamp vaccine at any dose. Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 sclamp elicited a similar antigen-specific response irrespective of dose: 4 weeks after the initial dose (day 29) with 5 μg dose (geometric mean titre [GMT] 6400, 95% CI 3683-11 122), with 15 μg dose (7492, 4959-11 319), and the two 45 μg dose cohorts (8770, 5526-13 920 in the two-dose 45 μg cohort; 8793, 5570-13 881 in the single-dose 45 μg cohort); 4 weeks after the second dose (day 57) with two 5 μg doses (102 400, 64 857-161 676), with two 15 μg doses (74 725, 51 300-108 847), with two 45 μg doses (79 586, 55 430-114 268), only a single 45 μg dose (4795, 2858-8043). At day 57, 67 (99%) of 68 participants who received two doses of sclamp vaccine at any concentration produced a neutralising immune response, compared with six (25%) of 24 who received a single 45 μg dose and none of 22 who received placebo. Participants receiving two doses of sclamp vaccine elicited similar neutralisation titres, irrespective of dose: two 5 μg doses (GMT 228, 95% CI 146-356), two 15 μg doses (230, 170-312), and two 45 μg doses (239, 187-307).

interpretationThis first-in-human trial shows that a subunit vaccine comprising mammalian cell culture-derived, MF59-adjuvanted, molecular clamp-stabilised recombinant spike protein elicits strong immune responses with a promising safety profile. However, the glycoprotein 41 peptide present in the clamp created HIV diagnostic assay interference, a possible barrier to widespread use highlighting the criticality of potential non-spike directed immunogenicity during vaccine development. Studies are ongoing with alternative molecular clamp trimerisation domains to ameliorate this response.

fundingCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, National Health and Medical Research Council, Queensland Government, and further philanthropic sources listed in the acknowledgments.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAustraliaCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePandemicsPolysorbatesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusSqualeneVaccinationAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesMF59 oil emulsionPolysorbatesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Squalene

Identifiers

PMID33887208
PMCPMC8055208
OpenAlexW3155199102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.