Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33887150›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021

The Neural Circuitry Underlying the "Rhythm Effect" in Stuttering.

Saul A Frankford, Elizabeth S Heller Murray, Matthew Masapollo, Shanqing Cai, Jason A Tourville, Alfonso Nieto-Castañón, Frank H Guenther

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hand Preference in Stuttering: Meta-Analyses.Neuropsychology review · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Neural subtypes in developmental stuttering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. DIVA Meets EEG: Model Validation Using Formant-Shift Reflex.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saul A FrankfordDepartment of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
Elizabeth S Heller MurrayDepartment of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
Matthew MasapolloDepartment of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
Shanqing CaiDepartment of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
Jason A TourvilleDepartment of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
Alfonso Nieto-CastañónDepartment of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
Frank H GuentherDepartment of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
Boston University · US

Funding

Sequencing and Initiation in Speech ProductionR01DC007683 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FRANK H GUENTHER · 2006 to 2026
$9.0M
Advanced Research Training in Communication Sciences and DisordersT32DC013017 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Cara E. Stepp · 2016 to 2026
$4.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007683NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC013017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Stuttering is characterized by intermittent speech disfluencies, which are dramatically reduced when speakers synchronize their speech with a steady beat. The goal of this study was to characterize the neural underpinnings of this phenomenon using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Method Data were collected from 16 adults who stutter and 17 adults who do not stutter while they read sentences aloud either in a normal, self-paced fashion or paced by the beat of a series of isochronous tones ("rhythmic"). Task activation and task-based functional connectivity analyses were carried out to compare neural responses between speaking conditions and groups after controlling for speaking rate. Results Adults who stutter produced fewer disfluent trials in the rhythmic condition than in the normal condition. Adults who stutter did not have any significant changes in activation between the rhythmic condition and the normal condition, but when groups were collapsed, participants had greater activation in the rhythmic condition in regions associated with speech sequencing, sensory feedback control, and timing perception. Adults who stutter also demonstrated increased functional connectivity among cerebellar regions during rhythmic speech as compared to normal speech and decreased connectivity between the left inferior cerebellum and the left prefrontal cortex. Conclusions Modulation of connectivity in the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex during rhythmic speech suggests that this fluency-inducing technique activates a compensatory timing system in the cerebellum and potentially modulates top-down motor control and attentional systems. These findings corroborate previous work associating the cerebellum with fluency in adults who stutter and indicate that the cerebellum may be targeted to enhance future therapeutic interventions. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14417681.

Indexed as

StutteringAdultHumansLanguageReadingSpeechSpeech Production Measurement

Identifiers

PMID33887150
PMCPMC8740675
OpenAlexW3153904958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.