ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021
The Neural Circuitry Underlying the "Rhythm Effect" in Stuttering.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hand Preference in Stuttering: Meta-Analyses.Neuropsychology review · 2024Pooled it
- A Proof-of-Concept Study of Gamified Rhythmic Training in Preadolescents Who Stutter.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Trial
- Effect of spatial attention on anatomical and external reference frames in tactile localization.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Neural subtypes in developmental stuttering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Differential contribution of working memory to auditory rhythm discrimination in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Evidence for planning and motor subtypes of stuttering based on resting state functional connectivity.Brain and language · 2024Article
- Knowns and unknowns about the neurobiology of stuttering.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Speaking to a metronome reduces kinematic variability in typical speakers and people who stutter.PloS one · 2024Article
- DIVA Meets EEG: Model Validation Using Formant-Shift Reflex.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Auditory feedback control in adults who stutter during metronome-paced speech I. Timing Perturbation.Journal of fluency disorders · 2023Article
- Which factors modulate spontaneous motor tempo? A systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Auditory rhythm discrimination in adults who stutter: An fMRI study.Brain and language · 2023Article
- A comparison of structural morphometry in children and adults with persistent developmental stuttering.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Auditory feedback control in adults who stutter during metronome-paced speech II. Formant Perturbation.Journal of fluency disorders · 2022Article
- Reinvestigating the Neural Bases Involved in Speech Production of Stutterers: An ALE Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Neural activity during solo and choral reading: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of overt continuous speech production in adults who stutter.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Processing rhythm in speech and music: Shared mechanisms and implications for developmental speech and language disorders.Neuropsychology · 2021Review
- Anticipation strategies of motor control in children and adolescents with cerebellar pathologies and typical development: a dual task paradigm.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- White matter correlates of sensorimotor synchronization in persistent developmental stuttering.Journal of communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Stuttering is characterized by intermittent speech disfluencies, which are dramatically reduced when speakers synchronize their speech with a steady beat. The goal of this study was to characterize the neural underpinnings of this phenomenon using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Method Data were collected from 16 adults who stutter and 17 adults who do not stutter while they read sentences aloud either in a normal, self-paced fashion or paced by the beat of a series of isochronous tones ("rhythmic"). Task activation and task-based functional connectivity analyses were carried out to compare neural responses between speaking conditions and groups after controlling for speaking rate. Results Adults who stutter produced fewer disfluent trials in the rhythmic condition than in the normal condition. Adults who stutter did not have any significant changes in activation between the rhythmic condition and the normal condition, but when groups were collapsed, participants had greater activation in the rhythmic condition in regions associated with speech sequencing, sensory feedback control, and timing perception. Adults who stutter also demonstrated increased functional connectivity among cerebellar regions during rhythmic speech as compared to normal speech and decreased connectivity between the left inferior cerebellum and the left prefrontal cortex. Conclusions Modulation of connectivity in the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex during rhythmic speech suggests that this fluency-inducing technique activates a compensatory timing system in the cerebellum and potentially modulates top-down motor control and attentional systems. These findings corroborate previous work associating the cerebellum with fluency in adults who stutter and indicate that the cerebellum may be targeted to enhance future therapeutic interventions. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14417681.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.