Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33886937›Full record

ReviewEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2021

Convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19 critically ill patients during advanced phases of clinical trials and their preliminary results.

Fernando Anselmo de Oliveira, Mariana Penteado Nucci, Gabriel Nery de Albuquerque Rego, Arielly da Hora Alves, Luciana Cavalheiro Marti, Leopoldo Penteado Nucci, Javier Bustamante Mamani, Lionel Fernel Gamarra

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. COVID-19 and chronic kidney disease: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. An overview on the current available treatment for COVID-19 and the impact of antibiotic administration during the pandemic.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando Anselmo de OliveiraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-1694
Mariana Penteado NucciHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1502-9215
Gabriel Nery de Albuquerque RegoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2011-0373
Arielly da Hora AlvesHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3570-0827
Luciana Cavalheiro MartiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3890-0827
Leopoldo Penteado NucciCentro Universitário do Planalto Central Apparecido dos Santos, Gama, DF, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-5845
Javier Bustamante MamaniHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5038-0070
Lionel Fernel GamarraHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3910-0047
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade do Planalto Catarinense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to highlight the global scientific effort to fight the SARS-CoV-2, addressing the preliminary results of passive immunization through convalescent plasma. We performed a search at the major databases of interventional clinical trial protocols about the transfusion of convalescent plasma in patients with COVID-19, as well as, published articles (n≥25), using the following search strategy: [(COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 OR nCoV-2019) AND (Convalescent plasma OR Plasma exchange) AND (Treatment OR Therapy)]. A total of 24 interventional clinical trial protocols (advanced in phases II-III, III, and IV) were included in this review, as well as three studies that had enough outcomes to evaluate the efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy for patients with COVID-19. All interventional clinical trial protocols applied approximately 500mL of convalescent plasma (from single or more donations) in hospitalized patients, mainly in patients with severe disease associated with standard therapy for COVID-19, and compared to placebo or standard therapy plus specific drugs. Most of interventional clinical trial protocols are multicenter, and the phase IV studies are recruiting at intercontinental centers of North America, Oceania, Europe, but most are recruiting center inside their own county. The three studies published reported similar approach of convalescent plasma intervention with decrease in length of stay, mortality, with less than 4% of adverse events, mainly for treating critical cases with life-threatening disease. All advanced clinical trials focused on convalescent plasma therapy in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in severe conditions, and the preliminary results provide strong evidence for therapy for the COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyCritical IllnessHumansImmunization, PassiveMulticenter Studies as TopicPlasmaSARS-CoV-2Treatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33886937
PMCPMC8034864
OpenAlexW3154332318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.