Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33886694›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2021

Toward understanding microbiota homeostasis in the plant kingdom.

Bradley C Paasch, Sheng Yang He

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. One Health, One Microbiome.Microbiome · 2025
    Review
  11. Inhibition of RNase to Attenuate Fungal-Manipulated Rhizosphere Microbiome and Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bradley C PaaschDepartment of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6799-0796
Sheng Yang HeDepartment of Energy Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1308-498X

Funding

Establishment of an aqueous environment as a novel mechanism of bacterial pathogenesisR01AI155441 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HE, SHENG YANG · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A diverse community of microorganisms inhabits various parts of a plant. Recent findings indicate that perturbations to the normal microbiota can be associated with positive and negative effects on plant health. In this review, we discuss these findings in the context of understanding how microbiota homeostasis is regulated in plants for promoting health and/or for preventing dysbiosis.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaDysbiosisHomeostasisHumansPlants

Identifiers

PMID33886694
PMCPMC8061798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.