Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33886652›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Effects of "fresh mechanically deboned meat" inclusion on nutritional value, palatability, shelf-life microbiological risk and digestibility in dry dog food.

Giorgia Meineri, Alessia Candellone, Sonia Tassone, Pier Giorgio Peiretti, Erica Longato, Daniele Pattono, Natalia Russo, Elena Pagani, Liviana Prola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giorgia MeineriDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Alessia CandelloneDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0858-4971
Sonia TassoneDepartment of Agriculture, Forestry, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Pier Giorgio PeirettiInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7072-3974
Erica LongatoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Daniele PattonoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
Natalia RussoFaculty of Veterinary Science, Campus Aurelio Saliceti, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Elena PaganiMonge & C. S.p.a., Monasterolo di Savigliano, Italy.
Liviana ProlaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fresh mechanically deboned meat (MDM) is usually claimed as high-quality ingredient on dry pet food recipes and this aspect may positively influence consumer choice. It is important to determine the scientifically sustainability of this claim and to assess the microbiological safety of MDM inclusion in dry pet food. Objectives were: 1) to evaluate the effect of inclusion of MDM in dry dog food on fatty acid profile and in vivo and in vitro digestibility, proposing a new system (DaisyII Incubator) to measure the in vitro digestibility for dogs; 2) to compare palatability of dry dog food containing MDM with dry dog food in which meat by-products (MBP) are the only animal protein sources; 3) to determine, whether or not, the inclusion of that ingredient changes the microbiology and the storage quality. Results indicated that MDM product was characterized by significant higher nutritional value in terms of fatty acids profile, in vitro digestibility (HV-IVD method) and lower palatability than the MBP product. Microbiological risk assessment showed no microbiological hazards for either product. After 6-months storage, the total mesophilic bacterial count ranged between 1.77 and 2.09 log CFU/g feed, while polyamine values were higher in the MDM (0.37 g/kg) than in the MBP (0.27 g/kg). The DaisyII Incubator was found to be a valid instrument for studying in vitro digestibility also for dogs, providing data simply, quickly, with less variability and costs than in vivo trials. In conclusion, MDM inclusion in dry dog food is microbiologically safe and it can improve its nutritional quality, at the expense of a reduced palatability. The higher polyamine levels fount in MDM-enriched petfood after 6-months storage, however, may represent a possible hazard, and further studies are still warranted.

Indexed as

DigestionNutritive ValueAnimal FeedAnimalsDogsFatty AcidsFecesFemaleFood HandlingMaleMeat ProductsPolyaminesFatty AcidsPolyamines

Identifiers

PMID33886652
PMCPMC8061975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.