ArticlePloS one2021
Genetic analysis of 32 InDels in four ethnic minorities from Chinese Xinjiang.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Chimerism Testing by Next-Generation Sequencing Using Insertion/Deletion Markers: Analytical Validation and Examples of Clinical Utilization.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2026Article
- Establishment of Thyroid Volume Reference Curves for Children in Xinjiang: An Exploration of Goiter Diagnosis and the Role of Iodine Nutrition.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Systematical explorations of forensic feature and population genetic diversity of the Chinese Mongolian group from northwest ChinaForensic sciences research · 2024Article
- Study on the Association betweenGenes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study used the previously constructed 32-plex InDels panel to investigated the genetic diversity of four ethnic minorities (Hui, Mongol, Uygur and Kazakh) from Xinjiang, and analyzed the genetic relationships between the four populations and 27 reference populations. No significant deviations were observed from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) at the 32 InDels for each population. The average observed heterozygosity (Hexp), average polymorphic information content (PIC), combined power of discrimination (CPD) and cumulative probability of exclusion (CPE) for the 32 InDels were all higher than the Qiagen Investigator DIPplex kit in the four populations from Xinjiang. The CPD ranged from 0.999999999999903 (Kazakh) to 0.999999999999952 (Hui) and CPE ranged from 0.9971 (Uygur) to 0.9985 (Hui), which indicated that the 32 InDels were capable for individual identification and could be a supplementary tool in paternity test for these populations. Population genetic analysis by the method of analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), FST, phylogenetic tree, TreeMix-based topology, multi-dimensional scale analysis (MDS), principal components analysis (PCA) and STRUCTURE analysis showed that Xinjiang Hui population has a close relationship with East Asians (EAS), especially Chinese Han, and the populations of Xinjiang Mongol, Uygur and Kazakh showed mixed ancestral components related to EAS and Europeans (EUR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.