Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33886550›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

TriatoDex, an electronic identification key to the Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), vectors of Chagas disease: Development, description, and performance.

Rodrigo Gurgel-Gonçalves, Fernando Abad-Franch, Maxwell Ramos de Almeida, Marcos Takashi Obara, Rita de Cássia Moreira de Souza, Jainaine Abrantes de Sena Batista, Douglas de Almeida Rocha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. New technologies for identification and surveillance of Chagas disease vectors.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. "WhatsBarb" Citizen Surveillance: Survey of Insects Mistaken for Triatomines.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  9. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rodrigo Gurgel-GonçalvesLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Área de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8252-8690
Fernando Abad-FranchFaculdade de Medicina, Núcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Maxwell Ramos de AlmeidaReal Comércio e Indústria de Alumínio Ltd., Brasília, Brazil.
Marcos Takashi ObaraFaculdade de Medicina, Núcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Rita de Cássia Moreira de SouzaGrupo Triatomíneos, Instituto René Rachou-Fiocruz Minas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Jainaine Abrantes de Sena BatistaH2J Comunicação & Marketing, Brasília, Brazil.
Douglas de Almeida RochaLaboratório de Parasitologia Médica e Biologia de Vetores, Área de Patologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correct identification of triatomine bugs is crucial for Chagas disease surveillance, yet available taxonomic keys are outdated, incomplete, or both. Here we present TriatoDex, an Android app-based pictorial, annotated, polytomous key to the Triatominae. TriatoDex was developed using Android Studio and tested by 27 Brazilian users. Each user received a box with pinned, number-labeled, adult triatomines (33 species in total) and was asked to identify each bug to the species level. We used generalized linear mixed models (with user- and species-ID random effects) and information-theoretic model evaluation/averaging to investigate TriatoDex performance. TriatoDex encompasses 79 questions and 554 images of the 150 triatomine-bug species described worldwide up to 2017. TriatoDex-based identification was correct in 78.9% of 824 tasks. TriatoDex performed better in the hands of trained taxonomists (93.3% vs. 72.7% correct identifications; model-averaged, adjusted odds ratio 5.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.09-11.48). In contrast, user age, gender, primary job (including academic research/teaching or disease surveillance), workplace (including universities, a reference laboratory for triatomine-bug taxonomy, or disease-surveillance units), and basic training (from high school to biology) all had negligible effects on TriatoDex performance. Our analyses also suggest that, as TriatoDex results accrue to cover more taxa, they may help pinpoint triatomine-bug species that are consistently harder (than average) to identify. In a pilot comparison with a standard, printed key (370 tasks by seven users), TriatoDex performed similarly (84.5% correct assignments, CI 68.9-94.0%), but identification was 32.8% (CI 24.7-40.1%) faster on average-for a mean absolute saving of ~2.3 minutes per bug-identification task. TriatoDex holds much promise as a handy, flexible, and reliable tool for triatomine-bug identification; an updated iOS/Android version is under development. We expect that, with continuous refinement derived from evolving knowledge and user feedback, TriatoDex will substantially help strengthen both entomological surveillance and research on Chagas disease vectors.

Indexed as

Insect VectorsMobile ApplicationsTriatominaeAdultAnimalsBrazilChagas DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33886550
PMCPMC8061935
OpenAlexW3156252600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.