Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33886283›Full record

ArticleACS sensors2021

Modeling of Quasi-Static Floating-Gate Transistor Biosensors.

Mathew S Thomas, Demetra Z Adrahtas, C Daniel Frisbie, Kevin D Dorfman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An Edible HAdvanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mathew S ThomasDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4252-8500
Demetra Z AdrahtasDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
C Daniel FrisbieDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4735-2228
Kevin D DorfmanDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0065-5157

Funding

TRAINING FOR FUTURE BIOTECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENTT32GM008347 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SCHMIDT-DANNERT, CLAUDIA · 1990 to 2021
$11.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floating-gate transistors (FGTs) are a promising class of electronic sensing architectures that separate the transduction elements from molecular sensing components, but the factors leading to optimum device design are unknown. We developed a model, generalizable to many different semiconductor/dielectric materials and channel dimensions, to predict the sensor response to changes in capacitance and/or charge at the sensing surface upon target binding or other changes in surface chemistry. The model predictions were compared to experimental data obtained using a floating-gate (extended gate) electrochemical transistor, a variant of the generic FGT architecture that facilitates low-voltage operation and rapid, simple fabrication using printing. Self-assembled monolayer (SAM) chemistry and quasi-statically measured resistor-loaded inverters were utilized to obtain experimentally either the capacitance signals (with alkylthiol SAMs) or charge signals (with acid-terminated SAMs) of the FGT. Experiments reveal that the model captures the inverter gain and charge signals over 3 orders of magnitude variation in the size of the sensing area and the capacitance signals over 2 orders of magnitude but deviates from experiments at lower capacitances of the sensing surface (<1 nF). To guide future device design, model predictions for a large range of sensing area capacitances and characteristic voltages are provided, enabling the calculation of the optimum sensing area size for maximum charge and capacitance sensitivity.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesTransistors, ElectronicElectric Capacitancebiosensingelectronic detectionextended gatefield-effect transistorfloating gatemodeling

Identifiers

PMID33886283
PMCPMC8336320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.