Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33886143›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2022

Functional status in rural and urban adults: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Philip St John, Verena Menec, Robert Tate, Nancy Newall, Megan O'Connell, Denise Cloutier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Functional status in rural and urban adults: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Philip St JohnDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8827-8220
Verena MenecDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Robert TateDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Nancy NewallDepartment of Psychology, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada.
Megan O'ConnellDepartment of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Denise CloutierDepartment of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CABrandon University · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

CIHR 50240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo document the prevalence of functional impairment in middle-aged and older adults from rural regions and to determine urban-rural differences.

methodsWe have conducted a secondary analysis using data from an ongoing population-based cohort study, the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). We used a cross-sectional sample from the baseline wave of the "tracking cohort." The definition of rurality was the same as the one used in the CLSA sampling frame and based on the 2006 census. This definition includes rural areas, defined as all territory lying outside of population centers, and population centers, which collectively cover all of Canada. We grouped these into "Urban," "Peri-urban," "Mixed" (areas with both rural and urban areas), and "Rural," and compared functional status across these groups. Functional status was measured using the Older Americans Resource Survey (OARS) and categorized as not impaired versus having any functional impairment. Logistic regression models were constructed for the outcome of functional status and adjusted for covariates.

findingsNo differences were found in functional status between those living in rural, mixed, peri-urban, and urban areas in unadjusted analyses and in analyses adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related factors. There were no rural-urban differences in any of the individual items on the OARS scales.

conclusionsWe found no rural-urban differences in functional status.

Indexed as

Functional StatusRural PopulationAgedAgingCanadaCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsUrban PopulationagingCLSAfunctional statusOARSrural-urban disparities

Identifiers

PMID33886143
PMCPMC9787669
OpenAlexW3154826442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.