Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33886111›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2021

Radiation-induced brain injury in patients with meningioma treated with proton or photon therapy.

Jiheon Song, Saif Aljabab, Lulwah Abduljabbar, Yolanda D Tseng, Jason K Rockhill, James R Fink, Lynn Chang, Lia M Halasz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jiheon Song *Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1J 0C1, Canada. jisong@toh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-0758
Saif Aljabab *Department of Radiation Oncology, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11564, Saudi Arabia.
Lulwah AbduljabbarDivision of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1J 0C1, Canada.
Yolanda D TsengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Jason K RockhillDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
James R FinkDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Lynn ChangDivision of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1J 0C1, Canada.
Lia M HalaszDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
University of Washington · USOttawa Hospital · CARoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiation therapy is often used to treat meningioma with adverse features or when unresectable. Proton therapy has advantages over photon therapy in reducing integral dose to the brain. This study compared the incidence of radiological and clinical adverse events after photon versus proton therapy in the treatment of meningioma.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted on patients with meningioma treated with proton or photon therapy at two high-volume tertiary cancer centers. Patients with a history of prior radiation therapy (RT) or less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded. Post-RT imaging changes were categorized into abnormal T2 signal intensities (T2 changes) or abnormal T1 post-contrast and T2 signal intensities (T1c+T2 changes) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical outcomes of adverse events and survival were compared between the proton and photon therapies.

resultsAmong the total of 77 patients, 38 patients received proton therapy and 39 patients received photon therapy. The median age at diagnosis was 55 years and median follow-up was 2.2 years. No significant differences in symptomatic adverse events were observed between the two groups: grade ≥ 2 adverse events were seen in 4 (10.5%) patients in the proton group and 3 (7.7%) patients in the photon group (p = 0.67). The 2-year cumulative incidences of T2 changes were 38.3% after proton therapy and 47.7% after photon therapy (p = 0.53) and the 2-year cumulative incidences of T1c+T2 changes were 26.8% after proton therapy and 5.3% after photon therapy (p = 0.02). One patient experienced grade ≥ 4 adverse event in each group (p = 0.99). Estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 79.5% (proton therapy 76.0% vs. photon therapy 81.3%, p = 0.66) and 2-year overall survival was 89.7% (proton therapy 86.6% vs. photon therapy 89.3%, p = 0.65).

conclusionsFollowing RT, high rates of T2 changes were seen in meningioma patients regardless of treatment modality. Proton therapy was associated with significantly higher rates of T1c+T2 changes compared with photon therapy, but severe adverse events were uncommon in both groups and survival outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Future studies will aim at correlating the MRI changes with models that can be incorporated into RT planning to avoid toxicity.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaProton TherapyRadiation InjuriesBrainHumansProtonsRetrospective StudiesProtonsBrain injuryMeningiomaProton therapyRadiation necrosis

Identifiers

PMID33886111
OpenAlexW3155372689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.