ArticleNeurology and therapy2021
STO: Stroke Ontology for Accelerating Translational Stroke Research.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward clearer recognition and easier usefulness: development of a cross-lingual atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease ontology.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Knowledge Representation and Management: Notable Contributions in 2021.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Correlation Analysis of Variables From the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOntology-based annotation of evidence, using disease-specific ontologies, can accelerate analysis and interpretation of the knowledge domain of diseases. Although many domain-specific disease ontologies have been developed so far, in the area of cardiovascular diseases, there is a lack of ontological representation of the disease knowledge domain of stroke.
methodsThe stroke ontology (STO) was created on the basis of the ontology development life cycle and was built using Protégé ontology editor in the ontology web language format. The ontology was evaluated in terms of structural and functional features, expert evaluation, and competency questions.
resultsThe stroke ontology covers a broad range of major biomedical and risk factor concepts. The majority of concepts are enriched by synonyms, definitions, and references. The ontology attempts to incorporate different users' views on the stroke domain such as neuroscientists, molecular biologists, and clinicians. Evaluation of the ontology based on natural language processing showed a high precision (0.94), recall (0.80), and F-score (0.78) values, indicating that STO has an acceptable coverage of the stroke knowledge domain. Performance evaluation using competency questions designed by a clinician showed that the ontology can be used to answer expert questions in light of published evidence.
conclusionsThe stroke ontology is the first, multiple-view ontology in the domain of brain stroke that can be used as a tool for representation, formalization, and standardization of the heterogeneous data related to the stroke domain. Since this is a draft version of the ontology, the contribution of the stroke scientific community can help to improve the usability of the current version.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.