ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2022
Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic surgery in colorectal emergencies: a systematic review of current evidence.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Pooled it
- Global research trends in robotic applications in plastic surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Towards environmentally sustainable surgery: a comparison of robotic surgery with other approaches.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic Intracorporeal Single-Stapled Anastomosis (RiSSA): Indications, Technical Benefits, and Current Limitations.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Review
- Article
- The Pregnant Surgeon: Welcoming the Advanced Ergonomics of Robotic Surgery.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Review
- Adoption of ergonomic practices among robotic surgeons: a survey from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Ergonomics Task Force.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Does robotic circumferential oversewing reduce anastomotic leakage in stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer surgery?Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Use of Robotic Surgery for the Management of Orbital Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Current Status and Future Applications of Robotic Surgery in Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Does robotic assisted surgery mitigate obesity related systemic inflammatory response and clinical outcomes in left sided colorectal cancer resections?Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Oncologic outcomes and survival of modern surgical approaches for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Total Mesorectal Excision with New Robotic Platforms: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Cologne ergonomic measurement for robotic surgery (CEMRobSurg) using the Hugo™ RAS System.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Comparison of totally robotic and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Learning Curve Analysis of Single-Incision Ovarian Cystectomy: Comparative Study of Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- A multimodal virtual vision platform as a next-generation vision system for a surgical robot.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Ergonomic hand positioning overcomes visual perception mismatch in nonsimulated robotic colorectal surgery.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- The rise of robotic colorectal surgery: better for patients and better for surgeons.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Step-by-step roadmap to building a robotic acute care surgery program (RACSP) in a level I trauma center: outcomes and lessons learned after 1-year implementation.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improved ergonomics for the operating surgeon may be an advantage of robotic colorectal surgery. Perceived robotic ergonomic advantages in visualisation include better exposure, three-dimensional vision, surgeon camera control, and line of sight screen location. Postural advantages include seated position and freedom from the constraints of the sterile operating field. Manipulation benefits include articulated instruments with seven degrees of freedom movement, elimination of fulcrum effect, tremor filtration, and scaling of movement. Potential ergonomic detriments of robotic surgery include lack of haptic feedback, visual, and mental strain from increased operating time and interruptions to workflow from crowding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33886064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.