ReviewBlood advances2021
Single-center experience with venetoclax combinations in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed AML evolving from MPNs.
Review in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of combination therapies vs monotherapy of hypomethylating agents in accelerated or blast phase of Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Olutasidenib demonstrates significant clinical activity in mutated IDH1 acute myeloid leukaemia arising from a prior myeloproliferative neoplasm.British journal of haematology · 2025Trial
- CPX-351 in combination with ruxolitinib for advanced-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: results of a phase 1 study.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Efficacy of a novel BCL-xL degrader, DT2216, in preclinical models of JAK2-mutated post-MPN AML.Blood · 2025Article
- SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Challenging Scenarios in the Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2025Review
- Real World Management of Cytopenias and Infections in Patients With Myelofibrosis Treated With Ruxolitinib.EJHaem · 2025Article
- Prevention and treatment of transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms to acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2025Review
- How I treat secondary acute myeloid leukemia.Blood · 2025Review
- Clinical management of patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia treated with venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents after achieving a response: a real-life study.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Treatment approach and outcomes of patients with accelerated/blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms in the current era.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Outcomes of intensive and nonintensive blast-reduction strategies in accelerated and blast-phase MPN.Blood advances · 2024Article
- The PML hub: An emerging actor of leukemia therapies.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2023Article
- Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: contemporary review and 2024 treatment algorithm.Blood cancer journal · 2023Review
- Comprehensive profiling of clinical JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms.American journal of hematology · 2023Article
- Targeted Therapy for MPNs: Going Beyond JAK Inhibitors.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2023Review
- Predictors of response to venetoclax plus hypomethylating agent therapy and survival in blastphase myeloproliferative neoplasm.Haematologica · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In patients with acute myeloid leukemia evolving from myeloproliferative neoplasms (post-MPN-AML), the clinical activity of the B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax remains to be determined. We review our experience with venetoclax-based regimens in 14 newly diagnosed (frontline [FL]) and 17 relapsed/refractory (R/R) post-MPN-AML patients. Venetoclax was used in combination with hypomethylating agents in 58% of cases and in 19% with intensive chemotherapy (treatment including cytarabine ≥1 g/m2 or CPX-351); the remaining patients received cladribine and low-dose cytarabine or isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 inhibitors. The median dose of venetoclax during the initial cycle was 100 mg in all patients (range, 50-800 mg) and 200 mg (range, 100-800 mg) for FL patients. The venetoclax dose was adjusted when used concomitantly with azole antifungal agents. In FL patients, complete remission with and without count recovery in 6 patients (median duration of 6.4 months) and partial remission in 1 patient was noted, with a median overall survival of 7 months. In R/R patients, no formal responses were seen, with a median overall survival of 3 months. Hematologic toxicities and adverse events were frequent; 83% of patients developed grade 3 or higher infection during the initial cycle. Severe hemorrhagic complications were observed in 14 patients, including 6 cases of intracranial and subdural hemorrhage. Overall 4-week and 8-week mortality were 10% and 32%, respectively. Given the substantial treatment-associated hematologic toxicity and mortality, and modest short-lived responses only in newly diagnosed patients with venetoclax-based regimens, additional treatment options are urgently needed for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.