Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33885374›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Development of a Resource Guide to Support the Engagement of Mental Health Providers and Patients With Digital Health Tools: Multimethod Study.

Gillian Strudwick, David McLay, Brian Lo, Hwayeon Danielle Shin, Leanne Currie, Nicole Thomson, Éric Maillet, Vanessa Strong, Alanna Miller, Nelson Shen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Gillian StrudwickCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1080-7372
David McLayCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3937-5363
Brian LoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1021-884X
Hwayeon Danielle ShinDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4037-4464
Leanne CurrieUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8232-2809
Nicole ThomsonCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9335-5959
Éric MailletUniversity of Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2222-5783
Vanessa StrongMemorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4454-3096
Alanna MillerMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9884-2147
Nelson ShenCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1788-8176
Janis CampbellMemorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4832-1853
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CADalhousie University · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs mental illness continues to affect 1 in 5 individuals, and the need for support has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, the promise of digital mental health tools remains largely unrealized due to a lack of uptake by patients and providers. Currently, most efforts on supporting the uptake of digital mental health tools remain fragmented across organizations and geography. There is a critical need to synthesize these efforts in order to provide a coordinated strategy of supporting the adoption of digital mental health tools.

objectiveThe specific aim of this project is to develop a web-based resource document to support the engagement of mental health providers and patients in the use of digital mental health tools.

methodsThe web-based resource was developed using a multimethod approach. A grey literature review was conducted in 2019 to identify relevant toolkits that are available in the public domain. This was supplemented with an environmental scan where individuals with expertise in the development, acquisition, implementation, and evaluation of digital mental health tools were invited to contribute additional tools or documents not identified in the grey literature search. An engagement workshop was held with stakeholders to explore how the resource document should be developed and delivered. These findings were collectively used to develop the final iteration of the resource document.

resultsBased on a gray literature review and environmental scan with 27 experts, 25 resources were identified and included in the resource guide. These resources were developed for patients and providers by organizations from 5 countries. An engagement workshop was held with 14 stakeholders, and barriers related to cultural sensitivity, sustainability, and accessibility of the toolkit were identified. The final iteration of the resource document was developed by the research team using findings from the gray literature review, environmental scan, and engagement workshop. The contents of the 45-page resource guide are directed at mental health care providers, administrators, and patients (inclusive of families and caregivers).

conclusionsThe use of a multimethod approach led to the development of a resource guide that builds on existing evidence on digital mental health tools and was co-designed with stakeholders and end-users. The resource guide is now publicly available online for free and is being promoted through digital health and mental health websites. Future work should explore how this document can be integrated into clinical care delivery and pathways.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHealth ResourcesHumansMental DisordersMental HealthPatient Education as TopicTelemedicineCOVID-19digital healthhealth informaticsmental healthnursing informaticspsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID33885374
PMCPMC8103299
OpenAlexW3139346977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.