SynthesisInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2021
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after intracranial stenting: Case report and systematic review.
Synthesis in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reperfusion injury from a haemodynamic standpoint and role of pressure-controlled reperfusion in avoiding reperfusion injury.European heart journal open · 2026Review
- Intraoperative application of FFR pressure wire and FLOW800 imaging as predictors of postoperative cerebral perfusion abnormalities in Moyamoya disease.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Status epilepticus of carotid web after carotid artery stenting: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- Recanalization of atherosclerotic stenosis and occlusion of intracranial vertebrobasilar artery.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Predictors and Outcomes of Periprocedural Intracranial Hemorrhage after Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Cone-beam CT angiography to assess the microvascular anatomy of intracranial arterial dissections.The neuroradiology journal · 2022Observational
- Nontraumatic convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Application of Balloon AngioplaSty with the dIstal protection of Stent Retriever (BASIS) technique for acute intracranial artery atherosclerosis-related occlusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome (CHS) is an uncommon complication observed after intracranial angioplasty or stenting procedures. Given to the increasing use of new devices for intracranial angioplasty and stenting (INCS), in selected patients with high ischemic stroke risk, an equally increasing knowledge of complications related to these procedures is mandatory.
conclusionsMonitoring of perfusion changes after INCS could play an important a role in determining patients with high risk of CHS. ASL Perfusion MRI might be used for promptly, early diagnosis of CHS after treatment of severe intracranial artery stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.