ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2021
Standardizing the Definition and Analysis Methodology for Complete Coronary Artery Revascularization.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Complete Revascularization in the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Trial
- Complete Revascularization and Angina-Related Health Status in the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Trial
- Long-term prognostic impact of complete revascularisation defined by CT-derived fractional flow reserve.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2026Article
- Demographics and clinical outcomes of patients with acute heart failure : The Acute Heart Failure Registry from the Clinic Ottakring (AHF-COR Registry).Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Associations Between Exercise Blood Pressure Responses and Oxygen Pulse During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease: long-term outcomes.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction deemed not suitable for surgical revascularisation. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) in collaboration with the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Long-term impacts of complete revascularization on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The impact of incomplete revascularization on survival in minimal invasive off-pump coronary artery surgery: a propensity score analysis of 1,149 cases.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Revascularization and Left Ventricular Dysfunction for ICD Eligibility.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Indicators of abnormal PET coronary flow capacity in detecting cardiac ischemia.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in-stable angina: association with recurrent chest pain.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2022Article
- The Continuum of Invasive Techniques for the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Immediate complete revascularization showed better outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors with left main or triple-vessel coronary diseases.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- Comparison of long-term cardiovascular and renal outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in multi-vessel disease with chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Importance of Visual Estimation of Coronary Artery Stenoses and Use of Functional Evaluation for Appropriate Guidance of Coronary Revascularization-Multiple Operator Evaluation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Standardizing the Definition and Analysis Methodology for Complete Coronary Artery Revascularization.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Review
- PCI in Patients With Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Impact of Complete Revascularization, and Contemporary Techniques to Improve Outcomes.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guideline-based medical therapy is the foundation of treatment for individuals with coronary artery disease. However, revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting may be beneficial in patients with acute coronary syndromes, refractory symptoms, or in other specific scenarios (eg, left main disease and heart failure). While the goal of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting is to achieve complete revascularization, anatomical and ischemic definitions of complete revascularization and their methodology for assessment remain highly variable. Such lack of consensus invariably contributes to the absence of standardized approaches for invasive treatment of coronary artery disease. Herein, we propose a novel, comprehensive, yet pragmatic algorithm with both anatomical and ischemic parameters that aims to provide a systematic method to assess complete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in both clinical practice and clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.