Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33884719›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Real-world therapeutic management and evolution of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care and urology in Spain.

Bernardino Miñana, José María Molero, Alfonso Agra Rolán, Miguel Téllez Martínez-Fornes, Rafael Cuervo Pinto, David Lorite Mingot, Ágata Carreño, Juan Manuel Palacios-Moreno

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernardino MiñanaUrology Department, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
José María MoleroPrimary Care Centre San Andrés, Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso Agra RolánMedical Department, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Téllez Martínez-FornesDepartment of Urology, Severo Ochoa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael Cuervo PintoMedical Department, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.
David Lorite MingotMedical Department, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.
Ágata CarreñoHealth Economics and Outcomes Research-Real World Insights (HEOR-RWI), IQVIA, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Manuel Palacios-MorenoGlobal Medical Classic and Established Products, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9946-4005
GlaxoSmithKline (Spain) · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESFundación Andrés Marcio · ESGlaxoSmithKline (India) · INHospital Universitario Severo Ochoa · ESInstituto Químico Biológico · ES

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to describe the real-world therapeutic management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (LUTS/BPH) attending primary care and urology clinics in Spain.

methodsThis observational, retrospective, multicentre study included men ≥50 years of age diagnosed with LUTS/BPH (≤8 years prior to study visit) (N = 670). Therapeutic management according to healthcare service (primary care vs. urology clinics) or progression criteria, proportion of patients with treatment change, patient profile according to therapy and evolution of LUTS severity were assessed.

resultsOverall differences were noticed in the management of patients between healthcare service (P < .001) and with or without progression criteria (P < .05). Most patients received pharmacological treatment at diagnosis (70.7%; 474/670), which increased at study visit (81.6%; 547/670) with overall similar profiles between primary care and urology clinics for each therapy. α1-Blockers were the most used pharmacological treatment across healthcare settings at diagnosis (61.8%; 293/474) and study visit (51%; 279/547). Only 27.1% (57/210) of patients with progression criteria at diagnosis and 35.6% (99/278) at study visit received 5α-reductase inhibitor (5ARI) alone or in combination with a α1-blocker. Overall, most patients did not change treatment (60%; 402/670) with a trend of more patients worsening in symptoms when not receiving α1-blocker plus 5ARI combination therapy.

conclusionMost patients with LUTS/BPH received pharmacological treatment; however, most men with progression criteria did not receive a 5ARI alone or in combination. These results support the need to reinforce both primary care and urologists existing clinical guideline recommendations for the appropriate medical management of patients with LUTS/BPH.

Indexed as

Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsProstatic HyperplasiaUrologyChildHumansMalePrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesSpain

Identifiers

PMID33884719
PMCPMC8365648
OpenAlexW3156377477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.