Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33884578›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Impact of Combined Vascular Resection and Reconstruction in Patients with Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Naohisa Kuriyama, Haruna Komatsubara, Yuki Nakagawa, Koki Maeda, Toru Shinkai, Daisuke Noguchi, Takahiro Ito, Kazuyuki Gyoten, Aoi Hayasaki, Takehiro Fujii and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Outcomes of Liver Transplant Versus Partial Hepatectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Patients Requiring Arterial Reconstruction.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naohisa KuriyamaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan. naokun@med.mie-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-0500
Haruna KomatsubaraDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Yuki NakagawaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Koki MaedaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Toru ShinkaiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Daisuke NoguchiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Takahiro ItoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Kazuyuki GyotenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Aoi HayasakiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Takehiro FujiiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Yusuke IizawaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Yasuhiro MurataDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Akihiro TanemuraDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Masashi KishiwadaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Hiroyuki SakuraiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Shugo MizunoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan.
Mie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerihilar cholangiocarcinoma often involves the adjacent vasculature, including the portal vein and hepatic artery. Combined vascular resection and reconstruction of the portal vein is more common than vascular resection and reconstruction of the hepatic artery. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the long-term outcomes in patients who underwent vascular resection and reconstruction for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

methodsBetween January 2004 and December 2020, 106 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were grouped into the no resection (n = 58), resection-portal vein (n = 31), and resection-hepatic artery with or without that of portal vein (n = 17) groups.

resultsThere were no significant differences in morbidity and mortality between the three groups. The resection-portal vein and resection-hepatic artery groups had a significantly higher number of advanced tumors than the no resection group, but no significant differences were detected in the rates of lymph node metastasis and R0 resection between the three groups. The 5-year disease-specific survival in the resection-portal vein (37.6%) and resection-hepatic artery (26.9%) groups were poorer than that in the no resection group (47.8%), although the former groups had a significantly better prognosis than the latter group (7.0%). Multivariate analysis identified high preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level (>5.7 ng/mL), intrahepatic metastasis, and non-R0 resection as independent poor prognostic factors.

conclusionAlthough the perioperative course in the resection-portal vein and hepatic artery groups was similar to that in the no resection group, the long-term prognoses were poor in the resection-portal vein and hepatic artery groups. Pre- and postoperative multidisciplinary therapy is required for patients with vascular resection and reconstruction.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaKlatskin TumorBile Ducts, IntrahepaticHepatectomyHumansPortal VeinRetrospective StudiesPerihilar cholangiocarcinoma, Vascular resection and reconstruction, Carcinoembryonic antigen

Identifiers

PMID33884578
OpenAlexW3153868968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.