Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33884506›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Periosteal reaction of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): clinical significance and changes during conservative therapy.

Sakiko Soutome, Mitsunobu Otsuru, Saki Hayashida, Souichi Yanamoto, Miho Sasaki, Yukinori Takagi, Misa Sumi, Yuka Kojima, Shunsuke Sawada, Hiroshi Iwai and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sakiko SoutomeDepartment of Oral Health, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8588, Japan. sakiko@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4646-587X
Mitsunobu OtsuruDepartment of Clinical Oral Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Saki HayashidaDepartment of Clinical Oral Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Souichi YanamotoDepartment of Clinical Oral Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Miho SasakiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Informatics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yukinori TakagiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Informatics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Misa SumiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Informatics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yuka KojimaDepartment of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Shunsuke SawadaDepartment of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi IwaiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Masahiro UmedaDepartment of Clinical Oral Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Toshiyuki SaitoDepartment of Oral Health, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8588, Japan.
Nagasaki University · JPKansai Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe previously reported that the periosteal reaction (PR) in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a poor prognostic factor in surgical cases, but it is not clear how PR changes during conservative therapy. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare computed tomography (CT) findings at the first visit and during follow-up visits in MRONJ patients subjected to conservative therapy and to investigate factors associated with the exacerbation of PR during conservative therapy.

methodsSixteen patients with MRONJ of the lower jaw who underwent conservative therapy and experienced a PR on CT images at the first visit and underwent CT examination again after 6 months or more were enrolled in the study. Clinical features and CT findings (extent of osteolytic lesion, extent of PR, type of PR, and changes during conservative treatment) were investigated.

resultsOn the second CT scan, the osteolytic lesion improved in 4 patients, had not changed in 5, and deteriorated in 7, whereas the PR improved in 5 patients, had not changed in 4, and deteriorated in 7 patients. PR was significantly deteriorated in patients who continued to receive antiresorptive agents during conservative treatment and in patients with deteriorated osteolytic lesions.

conclusionPR in MRONJ often expands during conservative therapy and the PR type progresses from the attached type to the gap type, and the irregular type, but discontinuation of antiresorptive agent may improve PR as well as osteolytic lesions.

Indexed as

Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the JawBone Density Conservation AgentsConservative TreatmentHumansJawRetrospective StudiesBone Density Conservation AgentsComputed tomographyConservative treatmentMedication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ)Osteolytic lesionPeriosteal reaction

Identifiers

PMID33884506
OpenAlexW3155832597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.