ArticleHGG advances2021
"Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results.
Article in HGG advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Impact of Screen-Sharing Visual Aids during Genomic Results Disclosure via Telehealth in Diverse Families in the TeleKidSeq Pilot Study.Public health genomics · 2025Trial
- The NYCKidSeq randomized controlled trial: Impact of GUÍA digitally enhanced genetic results disclosure in diverse families.American journal of human genetics · 2023Trial
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the University of North Carolina Genomic Knowledge Scale: Translation and Psychometric Validation in Japanese Populations.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- "Nobody listened to us for years": Parents' experiences of provider communication in the diagnostic odyssey.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2025Article
- Parental attitudes and experiences in pursuing genetic testing for their child's motor speech disorder.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Employing effective recruitment and retention strategies to engage a diverse pediatric population in genomics research.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- What matters to parents? A scoping review of parents' service experiences and needs regarding genetic testing for rare diseases.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Key drivers of family-level utility of pediatric genomic sequencing: a qualitative analysis to support preference research.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- The social value of genomic sequencing for disadvantaged families facing rare disease.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022Article
- Co-designing models for the communication of genomic results for rare diseases: a comparative study in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Hope versus reality: Parent expectations of genomic testing.Patient education and counseling · 2021Article
- Developing an Educational Visual Tool to Support Families Considering Whole-Exome Sequencing in Japan.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic counselors are trained to deliver complicated genomic test results to parents of pediatric patients. However, there is limited knowledge on how parents perceive this information and what they understand about the results. This research aims to qualitatively explore parents' experiences receiving genomic test results for their children. As part of formative research for the NYCKidSeq Study, we recruited a purposive sample of parents of 22 children stratified by child race/ethnicity and test result classification (positive, uncertain, or negative) and conducted in-depth interviews using a semi-structured guide. Analysis was conducted using grounded theory's constant comparative method across cases and themes. Parents described different elements of understanding: genetics knowledge; significance and meaning of positive, uncertain, or negative results; and implications for the health of their child and family. Parents reported challenges understanding technical details and significance of their child's results but gladly allowed their providers to be custodians of this information. However, of the different elements of understanding described, parents cared most deeply about being able to understand implications for their child's and family's health. These findings suggest that a counseling approach that primarily addresses parents' desire to understand how to best care for their child and family may be more appropriate than an information-heavy approach focused on technical details. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in larger parent cohorts and to explore ways genetic counseling can support parents' preferences without sacrificing important components of parent understanding and overall satisfaction with their experiences with genomic medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.