Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33884373›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2021

Neuroplasticity in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of reorganization of language processing.

Stephen M Wilson, Sarah M Schneck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rehabilitation interventions for Wernicke's aphasia and related fluent aphasia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. tDCS and Speech Therapy in Aphasia Treatment: A Multicenter Comparative Study of Efficacy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Right hemisphere language network plasticity in aphasia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identifying left and right hemispheres using functional connectivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Right Hemisphere Language Network Plasticity in Aphasia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen M WilsonLanguage Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Sarah M SchneckLanguage Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Neural Correlates of Recovery from Aphasia After StrokeR01DC013270 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Stephen M Wilson, Michael R de Riesthal · 2014 to 2026
$6.3M
An Adaptive Semantic Paradigm for Valid and Reliable Language Mapping in AphasiaR21DC016080 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WILSON, STEPHEN M · 2017 to 2018
$435k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013270NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery from aphasia is thought to depend on neural plasticity, that is, functional reorganization of surviving brain regions such that they take on new or expanded roles in language processing. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of all articles published between 1995 and early 2020 that have described functional imaging studies of six or more individuals with post-stroke aphasia, and have reported analyses bearing on neuroplasticity of language processing. Each study was characterized and appraised in detail, with particular attention to three critically important methodological issues: task performance confounds, contrast validity, and correction for multiple comparisons. We identified 86 studies describing a total of 561 relevant analyses. We found that methodological limitations related to task performance confounds, contrast validity, and correction for multiple comparisons have been pervasive. Only a few claims about language processing in individuals with aphasia are strongly supported by the extant literature: first, left hemisphere language regions are less activated in individuals with aphasia than neurologically normal controls, and second, in cohorts with aphasia, activity in left hemisphere language regions, and possibly a temporal lobe region in the right hemisphere, is positively correlated with language function. There is modest, equivocal evidence for the claim that individuals with aphasia differentially recruit right hemisphere homotopic regions, but no compelling evidence for differential recruitment of additional left hemisphere regions or domain-general networks. There is modest evidence that left hemisphere language regions return to function over time, but no compelling longitudinal evidence for dynamic reorganization of the language network.

Identifiers

PMID33884373
PMCPMC8057712
OpenAlexW3088512319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.