ArticleJournal of pediatric intensive care2021
Effects of Fenoldopam in the Pediatric Population: Fluid Status, Serum Biomarkers, and Hemodynamics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Effects of Aminophylline Effects on Hemodynamic Parameters and Fluid Balance in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Patients: Machine Learning Insights Using High Fidelity Data.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of fenoldopam for the treatment of hypertensive crises in children with kidney disease: a retrospective study.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid overload is a frequent complication in children during critical illness. Fluid restriction and diuretic agents have been the mainstay therapies so far. Fenoldopam, a selective dopamine-1 receptor agonist, is a diuretic agent with promising effects in the pediatric population. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the outcomes of pediatric patients who received fenoldopam. We hypothesized that the administration of fenoldopam will cause an increase in urine output and decrease in serum creatinine in this patient population. A comprehensive database search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries from the databases' inception through December 2018 was undertaken. Independent reviewers selected appropriate studies and the reviewed data. A meta-analysis was then conducted to determine the effects of fenoldopam on hemodynamics, the amount of vasoactive support, and renal function in children under the critical care setting. The selected end points were measured prior to the administration of fenoldopam and 24 hours after the initiation of the infusion: urine output, serum creatinine, serum sodium, inotrope score, heart rate, central venous pressure, systolic blood pressure, and mean blood pressure. Forest plots were generated to demonstrate individual study data as well as pooled data for each end point. A total of five studies (three retrospective cohort studies, two randomized trials) with 121 patients were included for analysis. No significant difference was observed in urine output, inotrope score, systolic blood pressure, or mean blood pressure. There was a statistically significant increase in serum creatinine and central venous pressure. There was statistically significant decrease in serum sodium and heart rate, and central venous pressure. This meta-analysis did not identify significant renoprotective or vasodilator effects from fenoldopam in this patient population. Although mild electrolyte and hemodynamic changes were identified, larger studies are warranted to determine the clinical significance of fenoldopam in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.