ArticleToxicology research2021
Comparison of gefitinib-induced skin adverse reactions (SAR) in C57BL/6 and FVB/N mice.
Article in Toxicology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vibrissal sensing in mammals in a changing world.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Review
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Formulae QY305 Reducing Cutaneous Adverse Reaction and Diarrhea by its Nanostructure.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) such as gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, are widely used in clinical practice and remarkably effective in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, there are some adverse effects while taking EGFR-TKIs, among which skin adverse reactions (SAR) are the most common events. At present, the poor outcome of SAR and insufficient research on SAR models need to be addressed. In this study we focused on the SAR models to lay a foundation for mechanism researches. Gefitinib, one of the EGFR-TKIs, was used as SAR inducing agents. We chose C57BL/6 and FVB/N mice as experimental model and they were divided into four groups. The weight and skin moisture of mice were detected every 7 days, itching behavior and abnormal eyelids were tested at 35th day after gavage, and survival rate was also recorded. The weight of unit area hair, length of whiskers and inflammatory cells were evaluated after mice sacrificed. C57BL/6 animals treated with gefitinib showed significant differences in survival rate, weight of unit area hair, skin moisture changes, skin dryness, itching behavior, whisker irregular growth, abnormal eyelids, and inflammatory cells; FVB/N animals treated with gefitinib only showed significant differences in survival rate, whisker irregular growth and abnormal eyelids, compared with the control group, respectively. In this study, we compared the similarities and differences of gefitinib-induced SAR between C57BL/6 and FVB/N mice, which illustrated different patients probably showing different symptoms clinically and provided experimental basis for researching mechanism of EGFR-TKIs induced SAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.