Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33884157›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

Boosting Breast Cancer Detection Using Convolutional Neural Network.

Saad Awadh Alanazi, M M Kamruzzaman, Md Nazirul Islam Sarker, Madallah Alruwaili, Yousef Alhwaiti, Nasser Alshammari, Muhammad Hameed Siddiqi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
24.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emerging Nanozyme Strategies for Precision Breast Cancer Treatment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Saad Awadh AlanaziDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1714-1948
M M KamruzzamanDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8464-1523
Md Nazirul Islam SarkerSchool of Political Science and Public Administration, Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8887-521X
Madallah AlruwailiDepartment of Computer Engineering and Networks, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5198-5730
Yousef AlhwaitiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6516-2292
Nasser AlshammariDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4374-3675
Muhammad Hameed SiddiqiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.
Jouf University · SANeijiang Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer forms in breast cells and is considered as a very common type of cancer in women. Breast cancer is also a very life-threatening disease of women after lung cancer. A convolutional neural network (CNN) method is proposed in this study to boost the automatic identification of breast cancer by analyzing hostile ductal carcinoma tissue zones in whole-slide images (WSIs). The paper investigates the proposed system that uses various convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures to automatically detect breast cancer, comparing the results with those from machine learning (ML) algorithms. All architectures were guided by a big dataset of about 275,000, 50 × 50-pixel RGB image patches. Validation tests were done for quantitative results using the performance measures for every methodology. The proposed system is found to be successful, achieving results with 87% accuracy, which could reduce human mistakes in the diagnosis process. Moreover, our proposed system achieves accuracy higher than the 78% accuracy of machine learning (ML) algorithms. The proposed system therefore improves accuracy by 9% above results from machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBreastFemaleHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID33884157
PMCPMC8041556
OpenAlexW3144825495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.