ArticleIranian journal of parasitology
Expression of Mir-21 and Mir-103a in
Article in Iranian journal of parasitology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stage-specific gene expression profiling ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026Article
- The expanding role of microRNAs in the biology and control of veterinary parasitic nematodes.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Alterations of plasma circulating microRNAs in BALB/c mice with Toxocara canis visceral and cerebral larva migrans.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Larva migrans in BALB/c mice experimentally infected with Toxocara cati ensured by PCR assay.BMC veterinary research · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Semi-Nested PCR Compared with Indirect-ELISA to Diagnose Human Fasciolosis.Iranian journal of public health · 2022Article
- Parasite-derived microRNAs as a diagnostic biomarker: potential roles, characteristics, and limitations.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundToxocariasis is one of the most neglected zoonotic diseases, predominantly caused by
methodsThis study was conducted on 324 individuals for ELISA test on toxocariasis in Tehran and Karaj, Iran 2019. Then positive samples for anti-
resultsAfter the experiments, the results were evaluated by REST software, Livak formula and quantitative
conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate miR-21 and miR-103a in toxocariasis, which shed light on the fundamental role of it as a biomarker and diagnostic tool. However, due to the changes in expression of these miRNAs were not vast to be used as biomarkers in diagnosis. Despite of that the changes in the expression of these miRNAs were not vast but they could serve as novel promising biomarkers for diagnosis of toxocariasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.