Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33883841›Full record

Trial reportEthiopian journal of health sciences2020

Comparative Effectiveness of Electrical Stimulation and Aerobic Exercise in the Management of Erectile Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Adamu Rislanu, Hassan Auwal, Danazumi Musa, Abdulahi Auwal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06397625 (Short- and Medium-term Efficacy of Treatment With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Pudendal Nerve in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06397625 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Short- and Medium-term Efficacy of Treatment With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Pudendal Nerve in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCamilo Jose Cela UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsErectile Dysfunction, Electric Stimulation, Pudendal NerveArmsPercutaneous electrical neurostimulation (Placebo), Percutaneous electrical neurostimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pelvic physical therapy for male sexual disorders: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Effectiveness of Physiotherapy Interventions in the Management Male Sexual Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adamu RislanuDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.
Hassan AuwalDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation (Physiotherapy), Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.
Danazumi MusaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal Medical Centre Nguru, Yobe State, Nigeria.
Abdulahi AuwalDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.
University of Maiduguri · NGBayero University Kano · NGFederal Medical Centre · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrical stimulation and aerobic exercise have been indicated to be beneficial in the management of erectile dysfunction individually. However, there is a scarcity of evidence comparing the two treatment approaches. This study investigated the effects of Electrical Stimulation (ES) compared with Eerobic Exercise (AE) in the management of individuals with Erectile Dysfunction (ED).

methodsThis study was a single-blind parallel randomized clinical trial. Thirty (30) patients diagnosed with ED (Mean age of 39.17 ± 6.21 years) were recruited and randomized into two groups, A and B with 15 participants in each group. Group A received ES while Group B received AE. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was used to assess the sexual functions of the participants at baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention. Within-group and between-group differences were analyzed using dependent and independent t-tests respectively.

resultsThe result indicated a significant difference between groups A and B [20.83 (1.83) Vs 14.33 (2.07), p=0.001] after 6 weeks of intervention. However, the mean effect was significantly higher in the ES group than in the AE group.

conclusionThe finding of this study indicated that ES is more effective than AE in the management of individuals with ED.Trial Registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201906776769795).

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionAdultDouble-Blind MethodElectric StimulationExerciseHumansMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeAerobic exerciseElectrical stimulationErectile dysfunctionInternational Index of Erectile Function

Identifiers

PMID33883841
PMCPMC8047238
OpenAlexW3111970563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.