ArticleScientific reports2021
Optical density based quantification of total haemoglobin concentrations with spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive quantification of total hemoglobin concentrations by visible-light spectroscopic optical coherence tomography: a validation study on healthy volunteers.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Article
- Tracking the dynamics of thrombus formation in a blood vessel-on-chip with visible-light optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Design and characterization of color printed polyurethane films as biomedical phantom layers.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spectroscopic optical coherence tomography (sOCT) has emerged as a new possibility for non-invasive quantification of total haemoglobin concentrations [tHb]. Recently, we demonstrated that [tHb] measured in ex-vivo human whole-blood with a conventional sOCT system achieves a precision of 9.10 g/dL with a bias of 1.50 g/dL. This precision improved by acquiring data with a combination of focus tracking and zero-delay acquisition (FZA) that compensated for experimental limitations, increasing to 3.80 g/dL with a bias of 1.50 g/dL. Nevertheless, sOCT precision should improve at least to [Formula: see text] g/dL to be clinically relevant. Therefore, sOCT-based [tHb] determinations require the development of new analysis methods that reduce the variability of [tHb] estimations. In this work, we aim to increase sOCT precision by retrieving the [tHb] content from a numerical optimisation of the optical density (OD), while considering the blood absorption flattening effect. The OD-based approach simplifies previous two-step Lambert-Beer fitting approaches to a single step, thereby reducing errors during the fitting procedure. We validated our model with ex-vivo [tHb] measurements on flowing whole-blood samples in the clinical range (7-23 g/dL). Our results show that, with the new model, conventional sOCT can determine [tHb] with a precision of 3.09 g/dL and a bias of 0.86 g/dL compared to a commercial blood analyser. We present further precision improvement by combining the OD methodology with FZA, leading to a precision of 2.08 g/dL with a bias of 0.46 g/dL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.