ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2021
Direct Fluconazole Disk Susceptibility Testing for Candida glabrata-Positive Blood Cultures.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Impact of the Disk Diffusion Test on Fluconazole De-Escalation in Patients with Candidemia.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct susceptibility testing from blood cultures has been reported to reduce the time interval between a positive blood culture to preliminary reporting of susceptibility and can underpin timely appropriate treatment of candidemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate direct susceptibility testing of Candida glabrata to fluconazole using disk diffusion compared to the Sensititre YeastOne broth microdilution-based method. We tested 83 isolates recovered from 93 spiked and prospective blood culture bottles. Comparison of the two methods showed excellent agreement, with no very major errors and only two major errors (2.4%). The accuracy of the fluconazole disk method was 97.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.6 to 99.7), with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 82.3 to 100) and a specificity of 96.9% (95% CI, 89.2 to 99.6). Direct antifungal disk susceptibility testing from blood cultures is a rapid and easy-to-perform method to determine fluconazole susceptibility of C. glabrata isolates and can be used safely to reduce susceptibility report time and improve clinical decision making regarding appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.