Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33883038›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2021

Behaviour-specific habitat selection patterns of breeding barn owls.

Robin Séchaud, Kim Schalcher, Ana Paula Machado, Bettina Almasi, Carolina Massa, Kamran Safi, Alexandre Roulin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metagenomic Profiling of Barn Owl (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Abundance, Diet and Foraging of Galápagos Barn Owls (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Nocturnal camouflage through background matching against moonlight.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Dietary Shift in a Barn Owl (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Robin SéchaudDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Building Biophore, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. robin.sechaud@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-5301
Kim SchalcherDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Building Biophore, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ana Paula MachadoDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Building Biophore, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bettina AlmasiSwiss Ornithological Institute, Seerose 1, 6204, Sempach, Switzerland.
Carolina MassaDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Building Biophore, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kamran Safi *Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour, Am Obstberg 1, 78315, Radolfzell, Germany.
Alexandre Roulin *Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Building Biophore, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHNational University of General San Martín · ARSwiss Ornithological Institute · CHUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 2015.0788Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_173178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intensification of agricultural practices over the twentieth century led to a cascade of detrimental effects on ecosystems. In Europe, agri-environment schemes (AES) have since been adopted to counter the decrease in farmland biodiversity, with the promotion of extensive habitats such as wildflower strips and extensive meadows. Despite having beneficial effects documented for multiple taxa, their profitability for top farmland predators, like raptors, is still debated. Such species with high movement capabilities have large home ranges with fluctuation in habitat use depending on specific needs.

methodsUsing GPS devices, we recorded positions for 134 barn owls (Tyto alba) breeding in Swiss farmland and distinguished three main behavioural modes with the Expectation-Maximization binary Clustering (EMbC) method: perching, hunting and commuting. We described barn owl habitat use at different levels during the breeding season by combining step and path selection functions. In particular, we examined the association between behavioural modes and habitat type, with special consideration for AES habitat structures.

resultsDespite a preference for the most common habitats at the home range level, behaviour-specific analyses revealed more specific habitat use depending on the behavioural mode. During the day, owls roosted almost exclusively in buildings, while pastures, meadows and forest edges were preferred as nocturnal perching sites. For hunting, barn owls preferentially used AES habitat structures though without neglecting more intensively exploited areas. For commuting, open habitats were preferred over wooded areas.

conclusionsThe behaviour-specific approach used here provides a comprehensive breakdown of barn owl habitat selection during the reproductive season and highlights its importance to understand complex animal habitat preferences. Our results highlight the importance of AES in restoring and maintaining functional trophic chains in farmland.

Indexed as

AESAgri-environment schemesGlobal positioning system technologyGPSHome rangePath selectionStep selectionTyto alba

Identifiers

PMID33883038
PMCPMC8059222
OpenAlexW3153219700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.