ArticleClinical epigenetics2021
Clinical evaluation of Bladder CARE, a new epigenetic test for bladder cancer detection in urine samples.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Follow-up strategies after trimodal treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Noninvasive Tests for Bladder Cancer Detection and Surveillance: A Systematic Review of Commercially Available Assays.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Pooled it
- Urine Methylation Test for Urothelial Cancer Diagnosis and Surveillance.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Validation of the diagnostic accuracy of a urine-based DNA methylation marker test in patients with upper urinary tract lesions.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsies in precision oncology for older adults with cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Novel DNA methylation biomarkers in urine for non-invasive diagnosis of bladder urothelial carcinoma.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Review
- Advances in Epigenomic Sequencing and Their Applications in Cancer Diagnostics.Precision chemistry · 2025Review
- Unleashing the potential of urine DNA methylation detection: Advancements in biomarkers, clinical applications, and emerging technologies.Current urology · 2025Article
- DNA Methylation in Bladder Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- DNA Methylation in Urine and Feces Indicative of Eight Major Human Cancer Types Globally.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Microsatellite Instability in Urine: Breakthrough Method for Bladder Cancer Identification.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Epigenetic Biomarkers as a New Diagnostic Tool in Bladder Cancer-From Early Detection to Prognosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Bladder cancer detection in urine by novel methylation markers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Translation of Epigenetics in Cell-Free DNA Liquid Biopsy Technology and Precision Oncology.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- A urinary assay for mutation and methylation biomarkers in the diagnosis and recurrence prediction of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- CircSTK39 suppresses the proliferation and invasion of bladder cancer by regulating the miR-135a-5p/NR3C2-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition signaling pathway.Cell biology and toxicology · 2023Article
- DNA Methylation in the Fields of Prenatal Diagnosis and Early Detection of Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Nanocomplexes of doxorubicin and DNA fragments for efficient and safe cancer chemotherapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBladder cancer (BC) is the 5th most common cancer in the USA. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer represents about 70% of all cases and has generally a favorable outcome. However, recurrence rates as high as 60 to 70% and progression rates of 10 to 20% necessitate intensive surveillance with cystoscopy. The invasiveness and high cost of cystoscopy poses significant burden on BC patients as well as on the healthcare system. In this study we test the feasibility of a simple, sensitive, and non-invasive detection of BC using Bladder CARE test in urine samples.
resultsUrine from 136 healthy and 77 BC subjects was collected using the at-home Bladder CARE Urine Collection Kit and analyzed with Bladder CARE test. The test measures the methylation level of three BC-specific biomarkers and two internal controls using methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes coupled with qPCR. Bladder CARE showed an overall sensitivity of 93.5%, a specificity of 92.6%, and a PPV and NPV of 87.8% and 96.2%, respectively. Bladder CARE has an LOD as low as 0.046%, which equates to detecting 1 cancer cell for every 2,200 cells analyzed. We also provided evidence that bisulfite-free methods to assess DNA methylation, like Bladder CARE, are advantageous compared to conventional methods that rely on bisulfite conversion of the DNA.
conclusionHighly sensitive detection of BC in urine samples is possible using Bladder CARE. The low LOD of the test and the measurement of epigenetic biomarkers make Bladder CARE a good candidate for the early detection of BC and possibly for the routine screening and surveillance of BC patients. Bladder CARE and the at-home urine sample collection system have the potential to (1) reduce unnecessary invasive testing for BC (2) reduce the burden of surveillance on patients and on the healthcare system, (3) improve the detection of early stage BC, and (4) allow physicians to streamline the monitoring of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.