Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33882972›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2021

Optimal stereotactic body radiotherapy dosage for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.

Ting-Shi Su, Qiu-Hua Liu, Xiao-Fei Zhu, Ping Liang, Shi-Xiong Liang, Lin Lai, Ying Zhou, Yong Huang, Tao Cheng, Le-Qun Li

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Managing hepatocellular carcinoma across the stages: efficacy and outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy : A retrospective study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ting-Shi SuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. sutingshi@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-4394
Qiu-Hua LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rui Kang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Xiao-Fei ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Changhai Hospital Affiliated To Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ping LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rui Kang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Shi-Xiong LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Lin LaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rui Kang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Ying ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rui Kang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Yong HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rui Kang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Tao ChengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rui Kang Hospital, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, 530001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Le-Qun LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Li_lequn@263.net.

Funding

China International Medical Foundation-Tumor Precise Radiotherapy Spark Program 2019-N-11-01National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (CN) 2017ZX10203207National Natural Science Foundation of China 81903257National Natural Science Foundation of China 81960534Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (CN) 2020JJA140141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal dose and fractionation scheme of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear due to different tolerated liver volumes and degrees of cirrhosis. In this study, we aimed to verify the dose-survival relationship to optimize dose selection for treatment of HCC.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 602 patients with HCC, treated with SBRT between January 2011 and March 2017. The SBRT dosage was classified into high dose, moderate dose, and low dose levels: SaRT (BED

resultsThe median tumor size was 5.6 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 1.1-21.0 cm). The median follow-up time was 50.0 months (IQR 6-100 months). High radiotherapy dose correlated with better outcomes. After classifying into the SaRT, SbRT, and ScRT groups, three notably different curves were obtained for long-term post-SBRT survival and intrahepatic control. On multivariate analysis, higher radiation dose was associated with improved OS, PFS, and intrahepatic control.

conclusionsIf tolerated by normal tissue, we recommend SaRT (BED

Indexed as

AdultCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateHepatocellular carcinomaRadiotherapy dosageStereotactic body radiotherapySurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID33882972
PMCPMC8058965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.