Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33882923›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

Relationship of attitudes toward uncertainty and preventive health behaviors with breast cancer screening participation.

Miho Satoh, Naoko Sato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Social Marketing for Health Equity: Promoting Preventive Health Behavior Among Women in Rural Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Which women go for screening?European journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miho SatohDepartment of Fundamental Nursing, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan. miho.sth@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8939-5595
Naoko SatoDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundcxsEarly detection of breast cancer is effective for prolonging survival, but the participation rate in breast cancer screening among target Japanese women remains low. This study examined the relationships between tendencies in decision-making under conditions of uncertainty, health behaviors, demographics, and breast cancer screening participation in Japanese women.

methodsSecondary analysis was performed using data from the 2017 Keio Household Panel Survey (KHPS). The study population consisted of 2945 households. Data were obtained from the KHPS for women aged 40 years or older. Breast cancer screening participation in the past year, risk aversion, time preference, health behaviors (e.g., smoking, alcohol consumption, and medical treatment received in the past year), and demographic variables were analyzed.

resultsData from 708 women were analyzed. Among the respondents, 28.8% had attended breast cancer screening in the past year. Factors found to significantly contribute to breast cancer screening participation included higher risk aversion (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-5.32; p = 0.043), medical treatment received in the past year (OR, 1.56; 95% CI = 1.06-2.30; p = 0.026), higher self-rated health (OR, 1.47; 95% CI = 1.18-1.83; p = 0.001), living above the poverty line (OR, 2.31; 95% CI = 1.13-4.72; p = 0.022), and having children (OR, 1.57; 95% CI = 1.02-2.42; p = 0.042). Factors significantly associated with non-participation in breast cancer screening were smoking (OR, 0.20; 95% CI = 0.10-0.42; p < 0.000), alcohol consumption (OR, 0.56; 95% CI = 0.37-0.86; p = 0.007), being self-employed (OR, 0.22; 95% CI = 0.10-0.46; p < 0.000), and being unemployed (OR, 0.48; 95% CI = 0.26-0.90; p = 0.022). No significant relationship was observed between time preference and screening participation.

conclusionsThe results indicate that women who recognize the actual risk of developing breast cancer or have high awareness of breast cancer prevention tend to participate in breast cancer screening. Barriers to screening participation are not working for an organization that encourages screening and low income.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerChildFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMammographyMass ScreeningUncertaintyBreast cancerBreast cancer screeningHealth behaviorMammographyRisk aversion

Identifiers

PMID33882923
PMCPMC8061057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.