ArticleBMC cancer2021
Women's experiences in a community-based screen-and-treat cervical cancer prevention program in rural Malawi: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Influencing the Experience of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.JCO global oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of thermal ablation compared to cryotherapy and loop diathermy in a screen-and-treat approach to cervical cancer, Zambia.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Trial
- Community-based interventions for non-communicable diseases in Africa: a scoping review of scope, effectiveness, and implementation factors.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Malawi: An Integrative Literature Review.Oncology nursing forum · 2025Review
- Client perspectives and satisfaction with integrating facility and community-based HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening with family planning: a mixed method study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Acceptability of self-sampling for high-risk HPV DNA testing for primary cervical cancer screening among women in Thyolo, Malawi: A qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Experiences of women participating in a human papillomavirus-based screen-triage-and treat strategy for cervical cancer prevention in Malawi.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Exploring the sources of cervical cancer screening self-efficacy among rural females: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Article
- Co-creation of human papillomavirus self-sampling delivery strategies for cervical cancer screening in rural Zimbabwe: nominal group technique.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Understanding the cervical cancer self-collection preferences of women living in urban and rural Rwanda.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Women's perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of an HPV screen-and-treat approach to cervical cancer prevention in Iquitos, Peru: a qualitative study.BMC women's health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMalawi has the world's highest cervical cancer incidence and mortality due to high rate of HIV coupled with inadequate screening and treatment services. The country's cervical cancer control program uses visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and cryotherapy, but screening is largely limited by poor access to facilities, high cost of cryotherapy gas, and high loss-to-follow-up. To overcome these limitations, we implemented a community-based screen-and-treat pilot program with VIA and thermocoagulation. Through a qualitative study, we explore the experiences of women who underwent this community-based pilot screening program.
methodsWe implemented our pilot program in rural Malawi and conducted an exploratory qualitative sub-study. We conducted in-depth interviews with women who were treated with thermocoagulation during the program. We used semi-structured interviews to explore screen-and-treat experience, acceptability of the program and attitudes towards self-sampling for HPV testing as an alternative screening method. Content analysis was conducted using NVIVO v12.
resultsBetween July - August 2017, 408 participants eligible for screening underwent VIA screening. Thirty participants had VIA positive results, of whom 28 underwent same day thermocoagulation. We interviewed 17 of the 28 women who received thermocoagulation. Thematic saturation was reached at 17 interviews. All participants reported an overall positive experience with the community-based screen-and-treat program. Common themes were appreciation for bringing screening directly to their villages, surprise at the lack of discomfort, and the benefits of access to same day treatment immediately following abnormal screening. Negative experiences were rare and included discomfort during speculum exam, long duration of screening and challenges with complying with postprocedural abstinence. Most participants felt that utilizing self-collected HPV testing could be acceptable for screening in their community.
conclusionsOur exploratory qualitative sub-study demonstrated that the community-based screen-and-treat with VIA and thermocoagulation was widely accepted. Participants valued the accessible, timely, and painless thermocoagulation treatment and reported minimal side effects. Future considerations for reaching rural women can include community-based follow-up, cervical cancer education for male partners and self-sampling for HPV testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.