Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33882881›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

The impact of novel and traditional food bank approaches on food insecurity: a longitudinal study in Ottawa, Canada.

Anita Rizvi, Rania Wasfi, Aganeta Enns, Elizabeth Kristjansson

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Food-based interventions to mitigate household food insecurity in Canada: a systematic review.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Food Banks as a "Treasure Trove": Users' Experiences of a Western Australian Food Relief Organization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Food Relief Charter for South Australia-Towards a Shared Vision for Pathways Out of Food Insecurity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anita RizviSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Pvt, Room VNR5015, Vanier Hall, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada. arizv036@uottawa.ca.
Rania WasfiSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Pvt, Room VNR5015, Vanier Hall, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Aganeta EnnsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Pvt, Room VNR5015, Vanier Hall, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Elizabeth KristjanssonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier Pvt, Room VNR5015, Vanier Hall, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAPublic Health Agency of Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood insecurity is strongly associated with poor mental and physical health, especially with chronic diseases. Food banks have become the primary long-term solution to addressing food insecurity. Traditionally, food banks provide assistance in the form of pre-packed hampers based on the food supplies on hand, such that the food items often do not meet the recipients' cultural, religious or medical requirements. Recently, new approaches have been implemented by food banks, including choice models of food selection, additional onsite programming, and integrating food banks within Community Resource Centres.

methodsThis study examined changes in food security and physical and mental health, at four time points over 18 months at eleven food banks in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. The participants - people who accessed these food banks - were surveyed using the Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) and the Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-12). Statistical analyses included: pairwise paired t-tests between the mean perceived physical and mental health scores across the four waves of data collection, and longitudinal mixed effects regression models to understand how food security changed over time.

resultsThe majority of people who were food insecure at baseline remained food insecure at the 18-month follow-up, although there was a small downward trend in the proportion of people in the severely food insecure category. Conversely, there was a small but significant increase in the mean perceived mental health score at the 18-month follow-up compared to baseline. We found significant reductions in food insecurity for people who accessed food banks that offered a Choice model of food distribution and food banks that were integrated within Community Resource Centres.

conclusionsFood banks offer some relief of food insecurity but they don't eliminate the problem. In this study, reductions in food insecurity were associated with food banks that offered a Choice model and those that were integrated within a Community Resource Centre. There was a slight improvement in perceived mental health at the 18-month time point; however, moderately and severely food insecure participants still had much lower perceived mental health than the general population.

Indexed as

Food InsecurityFood SupplyCanadaFoodHumansLongitudinal StudiesOntario

Identifiers

PMID33882881
PMCPMC8061005
OpenAlexW3156498349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.