Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33882355›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2021

Control of innate immune response by biomaterial surface topography, energy, and stiffness.

Jefferson O Abaricia, Negin Farzad, Tyler J Heath, Jamelle Simmons, Lais Morandini, Rene Olivares-Navarrete

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jefferson O AbariciaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Negin FarzadDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Tyler J HeathDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Jamelle SimmonsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Lais MorandiniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Rene Olivares-NavarreteDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States. Electronic address: ronavarrete@vcu.edu.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Virginia Commonwealth University IRADCAK12GM093857 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL C BULLARD, John J Ryan · 2010 to 2026
$7.0M
Role of Wnt Signaling in Macrophage Response to BiomaterialsR01DE028919 · NIDCR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI OLIVARES-NAVARRETE, RENE · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Regulation of Fracture Healing by Macrophage-Derived Wnt LigandsF30AR076221 · NIAMS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ABARICIA, JEFFERSON OVERLIN · 2019 to 2023
$187k
NIAMS NIH HHS F30 AR076221NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE028919NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM093857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the focus of implantable biomaterials has shifted from bioinert implants to bioactive designs, recent research has highlighted the complex interactions between cell physiologic systems and material properties, particularly physical cues. From the cells known to interact with implanted biomaterials, the response of the immune system has been a critical target of study recently. Here, we review studies characterizing the response of innate immune cells to various material cues, particularly of those at the surface of implanted materials.The innate immune system consists of cell types with various roles in inflammation. Neutrophils and macrophages serve both phagocytic and signaling roles, especially early in the inflammatory phase of biomaterial implantation. These cell types ultimately dictate the outcome of implants as chronic inflammation, fibrosis, or integration. Other cell types like dendritic cells, mast cells, natural killer cells, and innate lymphoid cells may also serve an immunomodulatory role in the biomaterial context. This review highlights recent advances in our understanding of the role of innate immunity in the response to implantable biomaterials as well as key mechanobiological findings in innate immune cells underpinning these advances. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review highlights recent advances in the understanding of the role of innate immunity in the response to implantable biomaterials, especially in neutrophils and macrophages, as well as key mechanobiological findings in innate immune cells underpinning these advances. Here we discuss how physicochemical properties of biomaterials control innate immune cell behavior.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsImmunity, InnateLymphocytesMacrophagesProstheses and ImplantsBiocompatible MaterialsDendritic cellsHydrophilicityImmune responseImmunomodulationMacrophageNeutrophilsSurface roughnessWettability

Identifiers

PMID33882355
PMCPMC8497396
OpenAlexW3156569796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.