ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021
Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy - the need for guidance and QA tools.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-enhanced image registration for accelerating daily adaptive magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of classical and deep-learning deformable registration for magnetic resonance to four-dimensional computed tomography contour mapping in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Landmark-guided deformable image registration for accurate cumulative dose evaluation in lung reirradiation.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of subject-to-template registration schemes using CT and MR radiotherapy images with brain lesions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Standardising image registration and dose mapping for thoracic reirradiation: A national multi-centre benchmarking study.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical workflow for reirradiation: national consensus recommendations on imaging, treatment planning, dose accumulation, and treatment delivery.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: The impact of daily MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy on delivered dose.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Improving patient specific quality assurance for image registration: clinical use case of target contouring for PET deformable image registration.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparing methods to improve cone-beam computed tomography for dose calculations in adaptive proton therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Tools and recommendations for commissioning and quality assurance of deformable image registration in radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Review and recommendations on deformable image registration uncertainties for radiotherapy applications.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Review
- Integration of operator-validated contours in deformable image registration for dose accumulation in radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical implementation and validation of an automated adaptive workflow for proton therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- MIRSIG position paper: the use of image registration and fusion algorithms in radiotherapy.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2022Article
- The Investigating Image Registration Accuracy and Contour Propagation for Adaptive Radiotherapy Purposes in Line with the Task Group No. 132 Recommendation.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of the clinical use of deformable image registration (DIR) in radiotherapy and to gain an understanding of the challenges faced by centres in clinical implementation of DIR, including commissioning and quality assurance (QA), and to determine the barriers faced. The goal was to inform whether additional guidance and QA tools were needed.
methodsA survey focussed on clinical use, metrics used, how centres would like to use DIR in the future and challenges faced, was designed and sent to 71 radiotherapy centres in the UK. Data were gathered specifically on which centres we using DIR clinically, which applications were being used, what commissioning and QA tests were performed, and what barriers were preventing the integration of DIR into the clinical workflow. Centres that did not use DIR clinically were encouraged to fill in the survey and were asked if they have any future plans and in what timescale.
results51 out of 71 (70%) radiotherapy centres responded. 47 centres reported access to a commercial software that could perform DIR. 20 centres already used DIR clinically, and 22 centres had plans to implement an application of DIR within 3 years of the survey. The most common clinical application of DIR was to propagate contours from one scan to another (19 centres). In each of the applications, the types of commissioning and QA tests performed varied depending on the type of application and between centres. Some of the key barriers were determining when a DIR was satisfactory including which metrics to use, and lack of resources.
conclusionThe survey results highlighted that there is a need for additional guidelines, training, better tools for commissioning DIR software and for the QA of registration results, which should include developing or recommending which quantitative metrics to use. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This survey has given a useful picture of the clinical use and lack of use of DIR in UK radiotherapy centres. The survey provided useful insight into how centres commission and QA DIR applications, especially the variability among centres. It was also possible to highlight key barriers to implementation and determine factors that may help overcome this which include the need for additional guidance specific to different applications, better tools and metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.