ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021
Radiomics in radiation oncology for gynecological malignancies: a review of literature.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence construction: a review of the bridge between CT imaging features of lung ground-glass nodules adenocarcinoma and carcinogenic driver genes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Robustness of radiomics features on 0.35 T magnetic resonance imaging for magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- An Integrated Clinical-MR Radiomics Model to Estimate Survival Time in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Article
- Radiomics and Radiogenomics in Pelvic Oncology: Current Applications and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiomics is the extraction of a significant number of quantitative imaging features with the aim of detecting information in correlation with useful clinical outcomes. Features are extracted, after delineation of an area of interest, from a single or a combined set of imaging modalities (including X-ray, US, CT, PET/CT and MRI). Given the high dimensionality, the analytical process requires the use of artificial intelligence algorithms. Firstly developed for diagnostic performance in radiology, it has now been translated to radiation oncology mainly to predict tumor response and patient outcome but other applications have been developed such as dose painting, prediction of side-effects, and quality assurance. In gynecological cancers, most studies have focused on outcomes of cervical cancers after chemoradiation. This review highlights the role of this new tool for the radiation oncologists with particular focus on female GU oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.