Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33882079›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Effects of realistic e-learning cases on students' learning motivation during COVID-19.

Ann-Kathrin Rahm, Maximilian Töllner, Max Ole Hubert, Katrin Klein, Cyrill Wehling, Tim Sauer, Hannah Mai Hennemann, Selina Hein, Zoltan Kender, Janine Günther and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neonatal performed echocardiography course: Can we face it?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ann-Kathrin RahmHeidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-887X
Maximilian TöllnerHeidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.
Max Ole HubertHeidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin KleinDepartment of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Cyrill WehlingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Intoxication, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tim SauerDepartment of Hematology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hannah Mai HennemannDepartment of Hematology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Selina HeinDepartment of Cardiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Zoltan KenderDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Chemistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Janine GüntherDepartment of Hematology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Petra WagenlechnerDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Till Johannes BugajDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sophia BoldtDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph NikendeiDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jobst-Hendrik SchultzHeidelberg University Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKeeping up motivation to learn when socially isolated during a pandemic can be challenging. In medical schools, the COVID-19 pandemic required a complete switch to e-learning without any direct patient contact despite early reports showing that medical students preferred face-to-face teaching in clinical setting. We designed close to real-life patient e-learning modules to transmit competency-based learning contents to medical students and evaluated their responses about their experience.

methodsWeekly e-learning cases covering a 10-week leading symptom-based curriculum were designed by a team of medical students and physicians. The internal medicine curriculum (HeiCuMed) at the Heidelberg University Medical School is a mandatory part of clinical medical education in the 6th or 7th semester. Case-design was based on routine patient encounters and covered different clinical settings: preclinical emergency medicine, in-patient and out-patient care and follow-up. Individual cases were evaluated online immediately after finishing the respective case. The whole module was assessed at the end of the semester. Free-text answers were analyzed with MaxQDa following Mayring`s principles of qualitative content analyses.

resultsN = 198 students (57.6% female, 42.4% male) participated and 1252 individual case evaluations (between 49.5% and 82.5% per case) and 51 end-of-term evaluations (25.8% of students) were collected. Students highly appreciated the offer to apply their clinical knowledge in presented patient cases. Aspects of clinical context, interactivity, game-like interface and embedded learning opportunities of the cases motivated students to engage with the asynchronously presented learning materials and work through the cases.

conclusionsSolving and interpreting e-learning cases close to real-life settings promoted students' motivation during the COVID-19 pandemic and may partially have compensated for missing bedside teaching opportunities.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionCOVID-19CurriculumEducation, DistanceEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansLearningMaleMotivationPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social IsolationStudents, MedicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33882079
PMCPMC8059845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.