Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33882014›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19.

McKenzie Himelein-Wachowiak, Salvatore Giorgi, Amanda Devoto, Muhammad Rahman, Lyle Ungar, H Andrew Schwartz, David H Epstein, Lorenzo Leggio, Brenda Curtis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. A new sociology of humans and machines.Nature human behaviour · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

McKenzie Himelein-WachowiakIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3291-343X
Salvatore GiorgiIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7381-6295
Amanda DevotoIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3605-5997
Muhammad RahmanIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3963-5949
Lyle UngarDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-1443
H Andrew SchwartzDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook Unversity, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6383-3339
David H EpsteinIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8147-0386
Lorenzo LeggioIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-8754
Brenda CurtisIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2511-3322

Funding

Clinical Psychoneuroendocrinology and Neuropsychopharmacology (CPN)ZIADA000635 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI LEGGIO, LORENZO · 2020 to 2025
$15.2M
New approaches to addiction treatmentZIADA000624 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI EPSTEIN, DAVID · 2018 to 2025
$9.6M
Changes in Substance Use Following COVID-19: Harnessing Digital PhenotypingZIADA000632 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI CURTIS, BRENDA · 2020 to 2022
$1.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As of March 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been responsible for over 115 million cases of COVID-19 worldwide, resulting in over 2.5 million deaths. As the virus spread exponentially, so did its media coverage, resulting in a proliferation of conflicting information on social media platforms-a so-called "infodemic." In this viewpoint, we survey past literature investigating the role of automated accounts, or "bots," in spreading such misinformation, drawing connections to the COVID-19 pandemic. We also review strategies used by bots to spread (mis)information and examine the potential origins of bots. We conclude by conducting and presenting a secondary analysis of data sets of known bots in which we find that up to 66% of bots are discussing COVID-19. The proliferation of COVID-19 (mis)information by bots, coupled with human susceptibility to believing and sharing misinformation, may well impact the course of the pandemic.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social MediabotscoronavirusCOVID-19disinformationfake newsinfodemicinfodemiologyinfoveillancemisinformationonline communitiespublic healthsocial listeningsocial mediaspambotsTwitter

Identifiers

PMID33882014
PMCPMC8139392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.