ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2021
The Astrogenic Balance in the Aging Brain.
Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Integrated 3D light sheet and 2D multiplex imaging for deep histological characterization of somatic mouse glioblastoma.iScience · 2026Article
- New perspectives on heterogeneity in astrocyte reactivity in neuroinflammation.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2025Article
- Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acid Protein and Phosphorated Tau 181 Association with Presynaptic Density-Dependent Tau Pathology atRadiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Deciphering the role of transcription factors in glioblastoma cancer stem cells.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2024Review
- Coexisting Biopsy-Diagnosed Dementia and Glioblastoma.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- The Synucleins and the Astrocyte.Biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An inverse correlation between the incidence of cancer and neurodegenerative disease has been observed, with the prevalence of cancer peaking around 60 years of age, then slowly tapering off as neurodegenerative diseases increase in the elderly. Although the diseases rarely occur concurrently, the same genes are differentially expressed between the diseases, with four transcription factors found to be in common for their expression. In the brain, mature astrocytes are the origin of astrocytoma, which make up 58.2% of malignant brain tumors in patients 65 or older, while GFAP+ astrocyte-like neural stem cells from the subventricular zone give rise to glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma, which make up 41.6%. Likewise, in neurodegenerative disease, a decrease in astrocyte density is observed in early disease states, and senescent astrocytes increase. Because astrocytes coordinate synaptic function, astrocyte dysfunction likely contributes to or causes initial synapse loss and cognitive decline seen in neurodegenerative disease. In non-disease states, astrocytes retain their ability to successfully re-enter the cell cycle through adult astrogenesis to maintain the neuroenvironment, and controlled astrocytic proliferation could be an important contributor to neurological function. Disruption to this astrogenic balance could account for the inverse correlation of cell cycle dysregulation resulting in malignant astrocytes and tumorigenesis, and astrocytic senescence and cell death without self-renewal in aging resulting in neurodegenerative disease. The current understanding of the astrocytic roles of the transcription factors that could be the cause of this imbalance will be discussed, as well as possible therapeutic approaches to modulate their expression in the astrocyte.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.