Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33881707›Full record

SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021

A systematic review of craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal disease: past, present, and future.

L Maillie, L R Salgado, S Lazarev

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Dynamics and predictors of hematologic toxicity during cranio-spinal irradiation.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L MaillieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
L R SalgadoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Elmhurst Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
S LazarevDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. stanislav.lazarev@mountsinai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4397-9103
Elmhurst Hospital Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNew York Proton Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLeptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a rare but deadly complication of cancer in which the disease spreads to the cerebrospinal fluid and seeds the meninges of the central nervous system (CNS). Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) involves treatment of the entire CNS subarachnoid space and is occasionally used as a last-resort palliative therapy for LMD.

methodsThis review examined literature describing the role of CSI for LMD from solid and hematologic malignancies in adults. A search for studies published until September 1, 2020 was conducted using PubMed database.

resultsA total of 262 unique articles were identified. Thirteen studies were included for analysis in which a total of 275 patients were treated with CSI for LMD. Median age at time of irradiation was 43 years, and most patients had KPS score of 70 and higher. The most common cancers resulting in LMD were acute lymphocytic leukemia, breast cancer, and acute myelogenous leukemia. Median CSI dose was 30 Gy and 18% of patients were treated with proton radiation. 52% of patients had stable-to-improved neurologic symptoms. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 5.3 months. Patients treated with marrow-sparing proton radiation had median OS of 8 months. The most common treatment toxicities were hematologic and gastrointestinal events.

conclusionsDespite advances in systemic and radiation therapies, LMD remains a devastating end-stage complication of some malignancies. Treatment-related toxicities can be a significant barrier to CSI delivery. In select patients with LMD, marrow-sparing proton CSI may provide safer palliation of symptoms and prolong survival.

Indexed as

Craniospinal IrradiationAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMiddle AgedOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRadiotherapy DosageCraniospinal irradiationLeptomeningeal diseaseProton therapy

Identifiers

PMID33881707
OpenAlexW3154267063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.