Article3D printing in medicine2021
Systematic review of three-dimensional printing for simulation training of interventional radiology trainees.
Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and preliminary evaluation of a camera-assisted endovascular simulator using a three-dimensional printing.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Interventional Radiology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Proposal of a "Low-Cost" 3D-Printed Model for Vertebroplasty Simulation.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- A scoping review of literature about 3D printing: knowledge, skills and attitude for simulation educators in healthcare.3D printing in medicine · 2025Review
- Design and 3D printing of pelvis phantoms for cementoplasty.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Teaching Strategies in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Review
- Accurate full-scale patient-specific Circle of Willis models including aneurysms: A novel manufacturing approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Patient-specific mechanical analysis of pedicle screw insertion in simulated osteoporotic spinal bone models derived from medical images.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- Pilot Evaluation of Silicone Surrogates for Oral Mucosa Simulation in Craniofacial Surgical Training.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Usefulness of preoperative simulation with patient-specific hollow vascular models for high-flow renal arteriovenous fistula embolization using a preloading coil-in-plug technique.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
- The ultrasound use of simulators, current view, and perspectives: Requirements and technical aspects (WFUMB state of the art paper).Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesThree-dimensional (3D) printing has been utilized as a means of producing high-quality simulation models for trainees in procedure-intensive or surgical subspecialties. However, less is known about its role for trainee education within interventional radiology (IR). Thus, the purpose of this review was to assess the state of current literature regarding the use of 3D printed simulation models in IR procedural simulation experiences. MATERIALS AND
methodsA literature query was conducted through April 2020 for articles discussing three-dimensional printing for simulations in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library databases using key terms relating to 3D printing, radiology, simulation, training, and interventional radiology.
resultsWe identified a scarcity of published sources, 4 total articles, that appraised the use of three-dimensional printing for simulation training in IR. While trainee feedback is generally supportive of the use of three-dimensional printing within the field, current applications utilizing 3D printed models are heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of best practices standards in the realm of medical education.
conclusionsPresently available literature endorses the use of three-dimensional printing within interventional radiology as a teaching tool. Literature documenting the benefits of 3D printed models for IR simulation has the potential to expand within the field, as it offers a straightforward, sustainable, and reproducible means for hands-on training that ought to be standardized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.